Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene vs. polyisoprene for rubber gloves - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) offers superior impact resistance and chemical stability, making it less flexible but more durable than polyisoprene, which provides excellent elasticity and tactile sensitivity ideal for rubber gloves. Polyisoprene gloves are preferred in medical and laboratory settings due to their natural latex-like feel and hypoallergenic properties compared to ABS-based alternatives.

Table of Comparison

Property Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) Polyisoprene
Material Type Thermoplastic polymer Synthetic elastomer (rubber)
Flexibility Low to moderate High (elastic and flexible)
Durability Good impact resistance Excellent stretch and resilience
Use in Gloves Not commonly used for gloves Widely used for rubber gloves
Chemical Resistance Moderate resistance to chemicals Good resistance to water and oils, sensitive to some solvents
Comfort Rigid, less comfortable for gloves Soft, comfortable, natural latex alternative
Price Generally lower cost Moderate, depends on synthetic processing
Allergen Potential Low Low allergen risk vs. natural latex

Introduction to Rubber Glove Materials

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polyisoprene are prominent materials used in manufacturing rubber gloves, each offering distinct properties tailored for specific applications. ABS provides excellent impact resistance, chemical stability, and durability, making it suitable for protective gloves in industrial settings. Polyisoprene, a synthetic alternative to natural rubber, delivers superior elasticity, comfort, and tactile sensitivity, making it ideal for medical and surgical gloves requiring precision and flexibility.

What is Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS)?

Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) is a thermoplastic polymer known for its impact resistance, toughness, and chemical stability, making it highly suitable for various industrial applications. It is composed of three monomers--acrylonitrile, butadiene, and styrene--that provide a balance of strength, flexibility, and heat resistance. Unlike Polyisoprene, which is a natural or synthetic rubber primarily used in flexible, elastic gloves, ABS is typically not used for rubber gloves due to its rigidity and lack of elasticity.

What is Polyisoprene?

Polyisoprene is a synthetic rubber closely mimicking natural latex, known for its high elasticity, tensile strength, and skin-friendly properties, making it ideal for medical gloves. Compared to Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), which is a rigid thermoplastic commonly used for hard shells and casings, polyisoprene offers superior flexibility and comfort in gloves. Its excellent barrier protection against biological hazards and low allergenicity make polyisoprene a preferred material in healthcare settings.

Chemical Structure Comparison

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) features a rigid, multi-block copolymer structure combining acrylonitrile, butadiene, and styrene units, offering high impact resistance and chemical stability, whereas polyisoprene consists of a natural or synthetic polymer with repeating isoprene units providing excellent elasticity and biodegradability. The nitrile groups in ABS impart increased resistance to oils and chemicals, while polyisoprene's cis-1,4-polyisoprene backbone offers superior flexibility and tactile sensitivity crucial for glove dexterity. Chemical cross-linking in polyisoprene enhances mechanical strength and resilience, contrasting with ABS's thermoplastic nature, which ensures structural rigidity but less stretchability in glove applications.

Physical Properties: Durability, Elasticity, and Flexibility

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) gloves exhibit superior durability and resistance to abrasion compared to polyisoprene gloves, making them well-suited for heavy-duty applications. Polyisoprene gloves possess excellent elasticity and flexibility, closely mimicking natural rubber, which provides enhanced tactile sensitivity and comfort for prolonged use. While ABS sacrifices some elasticity, it offers higher chemical resistance and impact strength, whereas polyisoprene excels in stretchability and softness but is less resistant to harsh chemicals.

Barrier Protection Performance

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) gloves provide strong chemical resistance and excellent barrier protection against oils, acids, and aliphatic hydrocarbons, making them suitable for industrial applications. Polyisoprene gloves offer superior elasticity and a natural latex-like fit, delivering effective protection against biological hazards and many common chemicals but are less resistant to solvents compared to ABS. When prioritizing barrier protection performance, ABS gloves excel in chemical permeability resistance whereas polyisoprene gloves are preferred for comfort and protection in medical and laboratory environments.

Allergenicity and Skin Sensitivity

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) gloves tend to have lower allergenicity compared to Polyisoprene gloves, which can cause allergic reactions due to residual proteins from natural latex. Polyisoprene gloves offer superior elasticity and comfort but may trigger skin sensitivity in individuals with latex allergies because they contain natural rubber latex. ABS gloves provide a synthetic alternative with minimal risk of sensitization, making them suitable for users with sensitive skin or latex allergies.

Cost and Manufacturing Considerations

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) rubber gloves typically offer lower manufacturing costs due to the material's ease of processing and faster curing times, which contributes to higher production efficiency. Polyisoprene gloves, while providing superior elasticity and a more natural rubber feel, involve more complex manufacturing processes that increase production expenses. Cost considerations favor ABS for large-scale, budget-sensitive applications, whereas polyisoprene is preferred in scenarios requiring enhanced tactile sensitivity and comfort despite higher costs.

Environmental Impact and Sustainability

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) rubber gloves have lower biodegradability and contribute more to plastic pollution due to their petroleum-based composition, whereas polyisoprene gloves are derived from natural rubber, offering better biodegradability and reduced environmental footprint. The production of polyisoprene involves renewable resources and supports rubber tree plantations, enhancing carbon sequestration and sustainability compared to ABS. Life cycle assessments indicate polyisoprene gloves generate fewer greenhouse gas emissions and promote circular economy principles through improved recyclability and compostability.

Choosing the Right Material for Medical and Industrial Gloves

Choosing between Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) and Polyisoprene for rubber gloves depends on the specific requirements of medical and industrial applications. Polyisoprene offers superior elasticity, comfort, and barrier protection, making it ideal for medical gloves where dexterity and sensitivity are crucial. ABS, while more rigid and less flexible, provides enhanced chemical resistance and durability, making it suitable for industrial gloves exposed to harsh chemicals and abrasive conditions.

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene vs. polyisoprene for rubber gloves - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene vs Polyisoprene for Rubber glove



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene vs Polyisoprene for Rubber glove are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet