Silicone rubber vs. styrene butadiene rubber for tires - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Silicone rubber offers superior heat resistance and flexibility compared to Styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), which provides better abrasion resistance and cost efficiency for tire manufacturing. Tires made with silicone rubber perform excellently in extreme temperatures, while SBR tires excel in durability and traction on dry surfaces.

Table of Comparison

Property Silicone Rubber Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR)
Temperature Resistance Excellent (-60degC to 230degC) Moderate (-50degC to 100degC)
Wear Resistance Moderate High
Grip on Wet Surfaces Good Excellent
Durability High, UV resistant Good, but lower UV resistance
Cost Higher Lower
Fuel Efficiency Contribution Moderate High
Typical Applications High-temperature & specialty tires Passenger and commercial vehicle tires

Introduction to Silicone Rubber and Styrene Butadiene Rubber

Silicone rubber exhibits excellent thermal stability, flexibility at low temperatures, and resistance to ozone and UV radiation, making it suitable for extreme environments in tire applications. Styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) offers high abrasion resistance, good aging stability, and cost-effectiveness, which makes it a dominant material in tire manufacturing for tread compounds. The distinct polymer structures of silicone rubber, a synthetic elastomer with silicon-oxygen backbone, contrast with SBR's hydrocarbon-based copolymer, influencing their respective mechanical and chemical properties in tire performance.

Chemical Composition and Structure

Silicone rubber consists primarily of a polysiloxane backbone with alternating silicon and oxygen atoms, providing excellent heat resistance and flexibility due to its inorganic-organic hybrid structure. Styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) is a copolymer of styrene and butadiene, characterized by its hydrocarbon chain with alternating styrene and butadiene units that impart good abrasion resistance and tensile strength. The chemical composition difference between the Si-O backbone of silicone and the hydrocarbon backbone of SBR significantly influences their performance in tire applications, where silicone excels in extreme temperature stability and SBR offers superior mechanical durability.

Key Properties for Tire Applications

Silicone rubber offers exceptional temperature resistance, flexibility, and weathering stability, making it ideal for high-temperature and extreme weather tire applications. Styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) provides superior abrasion resistance, good aging properties, and cost-effectiveness, which are crucial for standard tire tread durability and traction. The choice between silicone and SBR depends on the required balance between performance in harsh environments and overall tire wear resistance.

Performance in Varying Temperatures

Silicone rubber maintains exceptional flexibility and resilience at both extremely low and high temperatures, ensuring consistent tire performance in freezing cold and scorching heat conditions. Styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) offers reliable durability primarily in moderate temperatures but tends to harden in cold weather, reducing traction and increasing wear. Tires with silicone rubber compounds provide superior thermal stability and enhanced grip across wide temperature ranges compared to SBR-based tires.

Durability and Longevity Comparison

Silicone rubber exhibits superior durability and longevity in tire applications due to its exceptional resistance to extreme temperatures, ozone, and UV radiation, which prevents cracking and degradation over time. Styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), while cost-effective and providing good abrasion resistance, tends to degrade faster under prolonged exposure to heat and environmental factors, leading to reduced tire lifespan. The enhanced elasticity and thermal stability of silicone rubber significantly extend tire durability compared to the more commonly used but less weather-resistant SBR.

Traction and Grip Analysis

Silicone rubber offers superior traction in extreme temperature conditions due to its excellent flexibility and thermal stability, making it ideal for maintaining grip on icy or wet surfaces. Styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) provides enhanced abrasion resistance and better dry-road traction, contributing to longer tire life and improved handling on asphalt. The choice between silicone rubber and SBR for tires depends heavily on the specific traction requirements and environmental conditions faced during use.

Environmental Resistance and Weatherability

Silicone rubber exhibits superior environmental resistance and weatherability compared to Styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), maintaining flexibility and performance under extreme temperatures, UV exposure, ozone, and moisture. SBR, while cost-effective, tends to degrade faster in outdoor applications due to vulnerability to oxidation, UV radiation, and ozone attack, leading to crack formation and loss of mechanical properties. Silicone rubber's excellent stability in harsh environmental conditions makes it the preferred choice for tires requiring longevity and reliability in diverse climates.

Cost and Economic Considerations

Silicone rubber typically incurs higher material and processing costs compared to Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR), making SBR more economically favorable for mass tire production. SBR offers cost efficiency due to its availability and established manufacturing infrastructure, contributing to lower overall tire production expenses. Despite the higher initial cost, silicone rubber can provide long-term savings through enhanced durability and temperature resistance, potentially reducing replacement frequency and associated costs.

Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Silicone rubber offers superior thermal stability and resistance to ozone and UV degradation, resulting in longer tire lifespan and reduced environmental waste compared to Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR). SBR, derived from petrochemical sources, typically has higher carbon emissions during production and lower recyclability, making it less sustainable. The eco-friendliness of silicone rubber is enhanced by its inert properties, which minimize harmful leachates and support sustainable tire manufacturing practices.

Which Rubber is Better for Tire Manufacturing?

Silicone rubber offers superior thermal stability, excellent resistance to ozone and UV aging, and flexibility at low temperatures, making it ideal for specialized tire applications requiring extreme durability and performance in harsh conditions. Styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) provides excellent abrasion resistance, good aging stability, and cost-effectiveness, which makes it the preferred choice for most passenger car and truck tire manufacturing processes. The decision depends on specific tire performance requirements; SBR is better suited for general tire production, while silicone rubber excels in high-performance or niche tire segments.

Silicone rubber vs. styrene butadiene rubber for tires - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Silicone rubber vs Styrene butadiene rubber for Tire



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Silicone rubber vs Styrene butadiene rubber for Tire are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet