Chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubber vs. silicone rubber for O-rings - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubber (CSM) offers superior chemical and abrasion resistance, making it ideal for O-rings in harsh industrial environments. Silicone rubber excels in high-temperature stability and flexibility, suitable for O-rings in automotive and medical applications.

Table of Comparison

Property Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene (CSM) Rubber Silicone Rubber
Temperature Range -40degC to 125degC -55degC to 230degC
Chemical Resistance Excellent resistance to ozone, weather, and many chemicals Good resistance to ozone and weather; poor resistance to fuels and oils
Compression Set Moderate Low, excellent for sealing applications
Elasticity Good Superior flexibility and elasticity
Water Resistance Excellent Good
Cost Lower cost Higher cost
Applications Outdoor seals, chemical processing, automotive High temperature seals, medical, food industry

Introduction to O-Ring Materials: CSM vs Silicone

Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) rubber O-rings offer superior resistance to chemicals, ozone, and weathering, making them ideal for harsh environments and industrial applications. Silicone rubber O-rings excel in high and low temperature stability, flexibility, and inertness, which suits medical, food processing, and electronic sealing needs. Selecting CSM or silicone depends on specific requirements such as chemical exposure, temperature range, and mechanical properties for effective sealing performance.

Chemical Structure Comparison: CSM and Silicone

Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) rubber features a saturated polyethylene backbone with chlorosulfonyl functional groups, providing strong resistance to chemicals, ozone, and weathering. Silicone rubber consists of a polysiloxane backbone with alternating silicon and oxygen atoms, bonded to organic side groups, offering excellent thermal stability and flexibility at extreme temperatures. The fundamental difference lies in CSM's hydrocarbon-based structure with chlorine and sulfonyl groups enhancing chemical resistance, whereas silicone's inorganic siloxane framework imparts superior thermal and oxidative stability.

Performance in Extreme Temperatures

Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) rubber O-rings exhibit excellent resistance to extreme temperatures, typically ranging from -40degC to 130degC, maintaining durability in harsh chemical and weather environments. Silicone rubber O-rings outperform CSM in temperature extremes, with an operational range from -60degC to 230degC, offering superior flexibility and stability in both cryogenic and high-heat applications. Silicone's inherent thermal stability makes it ideal for aerospace, automotive, and food processing industries where consistent sealing performance is critical under fluctuating temperature conditions.

Resistance to Chemicals and Oils

Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) rubber exhibits outstanding resistance to a broad range of chemicals, including acids, alkalis, and oxidizing agents, making it ideal for O-rings in harsh chemical environments. Silicone rubber, while offering excellent thermal stability and flexibility, has limited resistance to oils and hydrocarbons, which can cause swelling and degradation over time. For applications requiring superior chemical and oil resistance, CSM rubber O-rings provide enhanced durability and longer service life compared to silicone rubber counterparts.

Durability and Aging Properties

Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) rubber offers superior resistance to ozone, weathering, and chemical exposure, making it highly durable for O-ring applications in harsh environments. Silicone rubber excels in low-temperature flexibility and maintains elasticity over a wide temperature range, but it generally has lower resistance to abrasion and certain solvents compared to CSM. Aging tests reveal CSM rubber retains mechanical strength and compression set performance longer under UV and oxidative conditions, whereas silicone rubber is favored for thermal stability and inertness in aging scenarios.

Mechanical Strength and Flexibility

Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) rubber offers excellent mechanical strength with high tensile strength and abrasion resistance, making it ideal for heavy-duty O-ring applications. Silicone rubber provides superior flexibility and elasticity over a wide temperature range, maintaining performance in extreme cold or heat but generally has lower tensile strength compared to CSM. Selecting between CSM and silicone depends on the need for mechanical durability versus flexibility in dynamic sealing environments.

Applications in Different Industries

Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) rubber O-rings excel in chemical resistance and weather durability, making them ideal for automotive fuel systems, industrial machinery, and outdoor equipment exposed to harsh environments. Silicone rubber O-rings offer superior temperature resistance and flexibility, widely used in medical devices, food processing, and aerospace applications requiring biocompatibility and high thermal stability. Each material's unique properties determine its suitability across industries demanding specific performance in sealing solutions.

Cost-Effectiveness and Availability

Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) rubber offers superior cost-effectiveness compared to silicone rubber due to lower raw material and manufacturing expenses, making it a preferred choice for budget-sensitive O-ring applications. CSM is widely available in various grades and forms, ensuring consistent supply and ease of sourcing from multiple suppliers globally. Silicone rubber, while offering excellent temperature and chemical resistance, tends to be more expensive and less readily available in bulk for cost-constrained projects.

Environmental and Safety Considerations

Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSPE) rubber offers superior resistance to UV radiation, ozone, and chemicals, making it environmentally durable and safe for long-term outdoor applications. Silicone rubber, known for its excellent thermal stability and inertness, performs well in extreme temperatures but may have lower resistance to certain solvents and oils, affecting its safety in chemical exposure scenarios. Both materials are generally non-toxic and comply with industry safety standards, but CSPE's enhanced environmental resistance often translates to longer service life and reduced material waste.

Choosing the Right Material for O-Ring Applications

Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) rubber offers exceptional resistance to weathering, ozone, and chemicals, making it ideal for outdoor and industrial O-ring applications exposed to harsh environments. Silicone rubber excels in flexibility, temperature resistance from -60degC to 230degC, and inertness, suitable for food, medical, and high-temperature sealing uses. Selecting between CSM and silicone depends on factors such as chemical exposure, temperature range, and regulatory requirements to ensure optimal performance and durability in specific O-ring applications.

Chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubber vs. silicone rubber for O-rings - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubber vs Silicone rubber for O-ring



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubber vs Silicone rubber for O-ring are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet