Chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubber (CSM) offers excellent chemical resistance and UV stability, making it ideal for gaskets exposed to harsh environments. Silicone rubber excels in extreme temperature resistance and flexibility, suitable for gaskets requiring high thermal stability and sealing performance.
Table of Comparison
Property | Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene (CSPE) Rubber | Silicone Rubber |
---|---|---|
Temperature Range | -40degC to 125degC | -60degC to 230degC |
Chemical Resistance | Excellent against oils, solvents, and oxidants | Good resistance to water, ozone, and UV, limited to mild chemicals |
Weathering & Ozone Resistance | Excellent | Exceptional |
Compression Set | Moderate | Low, better sealing recovery |
Flexibility | Good | Superior, remains flexible at low temperatures |
Durability | High mechanical strength | Moderate mechanical strength |
Applications | Industrial gaskets exposed to oils, chemicals, and weather | Gaskets in high-temperature environments and food-grade applications |
Cost | Lower | Higher |
Introduction to Gasket Materials: CSM vs Silicone
Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) rubber offers excellent resistance to chemicals, ozone, and weathering, making it a durable option for gaskets used in harsh industrial environments. Silicone rubber, known for its wide temperature tolerance (-60degC to 230degC) and superior flexibility, excels in applications requiring heat resistance and biocompatibility. While CSM provides strong mechanical strength and oil resistance, silicone rubber is preferred for its inertness and performance in extreme temperature fluctuations.
Chemical Structure: Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene vs Silicone Rubber
Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) features a polyethylene backbone with chlorosulfonyl functional groups, enhancing its chemical resistance and durability in aggressive environments. Silicone rubber consists of a silicon-oxygen (Si-O) backbone with organic side groups, providing exceptional thermal stability and flexibility over a wide temperature range. The distinct chemical structures impart CSM superior resistance to oils and chemicals, while silicone rubber excels in heat resistance and weatherability, influencing gasket material selection based on application requirements.
Key Physical Properties Comparison
Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSPE) rubber offers exceptional resistance to ozone, weathering, and chemicals, making it suitable for gaskets exposed to harsh environments, with tensile strength typically ranging from 12 to 20 MPa and elongation at break between 200-400%. Silicone rubber excels in high-temperature stability, maintaining flexibility from -60degC up to 250degC, with tensile strength around 7-12 MPa and elongation at break often exceeding 300%, ideal for thermal sealing applications. CSPE exhibits superior mechanical durability and chemical resistance, while silicone rubber provides enhanced thermal resilience and excellent compression set characteristics for long-term gasket performance.
Temperature Resistance: Performance in Extreme Conditions
Chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubber (CSM) offers excellent resistance to high temperatures up to 150degC, maintaining durability and flexibility in harsh chemical and ozone environments. Silicone rubber outperforms CSM at extreme temperatures, operating reliably between -60degC and 230degC with exceptional thermal stability and weather resistance. For gasket applications requiring sustained high-temperature exposure and extreme temperature fluctuations, silicone rubber provides superior performance and longevity.
Chemical and Weathering Resistance
Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSPE) rubber exhibits outstanding chemical resistance against oils, solvents, and acids, making it ideal for gaskets exposed to harsh industrial chemicals. Silicone rubber, however, excels in weathering resistance, maintaining flexibility and durability under extreme temperatures, UV radiation, and ozone exposure. For applications demanding superior chemical resistance, CSPE is preferable, while silicone rubber is optimal for prolonged outdoor use with high weathering resistance.
Compression Set and Aging Characteristics
Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) rubber exhibits excellent resistance to compression set, maintaining shape and sealing performance under prolonged mechanical stress, especially in oil and chemical environments. Silicone rubber shows superior aging characteristics, resisting ozone, UV exposure, and extreme temperatures without significant degradation or loss of elasticity. When selecting gasket materials, CSM is preferred for aggressive chemical environments requiring durability against compression set, while silicone excels in applications demanding long-term environmental stability.
Cost Analysis: CSM Rubber vs Silicone Rubber
Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) rubber generally offers a lower initial cost compared to silicone rubber, making it a cost-efficient choice for gasket applications in budget-sensitive projects. CSM rubber provides excellent chemical and abrasion resistance, extending gasket lifespan and reducing replacement frequency, which can lower overall maintenance costs despite its lower upfront price. Silicone rubber, though more expensive initially, delivers superior thermal stability and flexibility across extreme temperatures, potentially minimizing downtime and enhancing performance in high-demand environments, thereby justifying its higher cost in specialized applications.
Typical Applications in Gasket Manufacturing
Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM) rubber is commonly used in gasket manufacturing for applications requiring excellent chemical resistance, weathering, and ozone resistance, making it ideal for automotive, marine, and chemical processing industries. Silicone rubber gaskets excel in high-temperature environments, electrical insulation, and food-grade applications due to their superior thermal stability and non-reactive properties. Both materials serve critical roles in sealing solutions, with CSM favored for aggressive chemical environments and silicone preferred for extreme temperatures and sanitary conditions.
Environmental and Safety Considerations
Chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubber (CSPE) offers excellent chemical resistance and durability, producing fewer hazardous byproducts during manufacturing compared to silicone rubber, which can release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) under high temperatures. Silicone rubber excels in thermal stability and biocompatibility, making it suitable for food-grade and medical gasket applications with minimal toxic emissions. Both materials are recyclable, but silicone's inert properties contribute to lower environmental persistence, reducing long-term ecological impact.
Making the Right Choice: Factors to Consider
Chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubber (CSM) offers excellent chemical resistance and weather durability, making it suitable for gaskets exposed to harsh chemicals and outdoor conditions, while silicone rubber excels in extreme temperature tolerance and flexibility at low temperatures. Consider the application's operating temperature range, chemical exposure, and mechanical stress when choosing between these materials for gasket performance. Evaluating factors like abrasion resistance, UV stability, and compression set behavior ensures a durable and efficient sealing solution tailored to specific industrial needs.

Infographic: Chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubber vs Silicone rubber for Gasket