Polylactic acid (PLA) offers biodegradability and ease of printing but has lower mechanical strength and heat resistance compared to Polyoxymethylene (POM), which provides superior durability, low friction, and excellent wear resistance for high-performance gear applications. POM is ideal for gears requiring high stiffness and dimensional stability under mechanical stress, while PLA suits lightweight, low-load prototype gears.
Table of Comparison
Property | Polylactic Acid (PLA) | Polyoxymethylene (POM) |
---|---|---|
Material Type | Biodegradable polyester | Engineering thermoplastic (Acetal) |
Mechanical Strength | Moderate tensile strength (50-70 MPa) | High tensile strength (60-70 MPa) with excellent stiffness |
Wear Resistance | Low - not ideal for high-friction gears | High - excellent for moving gear components |
Coefficient of Friction | Higher friction (approx. 0.5) | Low friction (approx. 0.2) for smooth operation |
Thermal Stability | Low heat resistance (glass transition ~60degC) | High heat resistance (service temp up to 100degC) |
Moisture Absorption | Moderate (can affect dimensional stability) | Low (retains mechanical properties in humid conditions) |
Environmental Impact | Renewable, compostable, biodegradable | Non-biodegradable, recyclable thermoplastic |
Typical Gear Application | Prototyping, low-load, low-speed gears | High-load, high-speed gears requiring durability |
Introduction to Polylactic Acid (PLA) and Polyoxymethylene (POM)
Polylactic Acid (PLA) is a biodegradable thermoplastic derived from renewable resources like corn starch, featuring good stiffness and ease of processing but limited heat resistance. Polyoxymethylene (POM), also known as acetal, is an engineering thermoplastic with high stiffness, low friction, excellent dimensional stability, and superior wear resistance, making it ideal for precision gears. Comparing PLA and POM for gear applications, POM offers enhanced mechanical performance and durability under load, whereas PLA is favored for environmentally friendly, low-stress uses.
Key Material Properties: PLA vs POM
Polylactic acid (PLA) offers biodegradability and easy printability but has lower mechanical strength and thermal resistance compared to polyoxymethylene (POM), which excels in high stiffness, exceptional wear resistance, and dimensional stability critical for gears. POM's high tensile strength (typically 60-75 MPa) and melting point around 175degC make it ideal for precision gear applications subjected to mechanical stress and heat. PLA's tensile strength ranges from 50-70 MPa with a lower glass transition temperature near 60degC, limiting its use for gears that require sustained load-bearing and temperature tolerance.
Mechanical Strength Comparison
Polylactic acid (PLA) offers good tensile strength around 50 MPa but exhibits lower impact resistance and brittle behavior compared to polyoxymethylene (POM), which provides higher mechanical strength with tensile strength typically ranging from 60 to 75 MPa and superior fatigue resistance. POM's excellent wear resistance and dimensional stability under load make it the preferred material for gears requiring high mechanical durability and smooth operation. Although PLA is biodegradable and easier to process, POM's superior mechanical properties ensure longer gear life in demanding engineering applications.
Wear Resistance and Durability
Polylactic acid (PLA) exhibits moderate wear resistance and biodegradability but lacks the long-term durability required for high-stress gear applications, making it more suitable for low-load or eco-friendly prototypes. Polyoxymethylene (POM), also known as acetal, demonstrates superior wear resistance, high tensile strength, and excellent dimensional stability, providing exceptional durability in demanding mechanical environments. For gears subjected to continuous friction and mechanical stress, POM outperforms PLA due to its enhanced resistance to abrasion and longer operational lifespan.
Thermal Stability in Gear Applications
Polylactic acid (PLA) exhibits lower thermal stability compared to polyoxymethylene (POM), making POM more suitable for gear applications requiring high heat resistance. POM maintains dimensional stability and mechanical properties at elevated temperatures up to 120degC, whereas PLA tends to deform or degrade above 60degC. This thermal performance difference makes POM the preferred material for gears operating under continuous mechanical stress and high-temperature environments.
Machinability and Ease of Processing
Polylactic acid (PLA) offers superior machinability compared to polyoxymethylene (POM) due to its lower melting point and ease of cutting with standard tools, resulting in minimal tool wear and precise dimensional control. PLA's biodegradability and lower processing temperatures make it favorable for applications requiring rapid prototyping and environmentally friendly solutions, while POM's higher crystallinity and toughness provide enhanced mechanical strength but demand specialized machining techniques. Processing PLA requires less energy and simpler conditions, whereas POM necessitates careful temperature management and drying to prevent degradation and optimize surface finish during gear manufacturing.
Environmental Impact and Biodegradability
Polylactic acid (PLA) offers a significant environmental advantage over polyoxymethylene (POM) due to its biodegradability and origin from renewable resources such as corn starch or sugarcane, making it a sustainable choice for gear manufacturing. In contrast, POM, a petroleum-based thermoplastic, poses environmental challenges as it is non-biodegradable and contributes to plastic pollution and greenhouse gas emissions during production and disposal. The biodegradability of PLA enables it to break down into water and carbon dioxide under industrial composting conditions, reducing long-term environmental impact compared to the persistent nature of POM in landfills and natural ecosystems.
Cost Analysis: PLA vs POM Gears
Polylactic acid (PLA) gears generally incur lower material costs compared to polyoxymethylene (POM) due to PLA's bio-based production and widespread availability. However, POM gears offer superior mechanical properties and durability, which can reduce long-term replacement and maintenance expenses. When evaluating gear applications, the initial cost savings of PLA must be balanced against POM's higher performance and lifecycle cost efficiency.
Real-World Gear Performance: Case Studies
Polylactic acid (PLA) gears demonstrate excellent biodegradability and low environmental impact but often exhibit lower mechanical strength and wear resistance compared to polyoxymethylene (POM) gears, which deliver superior stiffness, dimensional stability, and long-term durability in high-load applications. Case studies show POM gears maintain performance in automotive transmissions and industrial machinery under continuous stress, whereas PLA gears are more suited for light-duty, short lifespan applications such as prototype models or eco-friendly consumer products. Real-world testing confirms POM's resistance to creep and fatigue, making it the preferred choice for gears requiring precision and reliability.
Choosing the Right Material for Gear Manufacturing
Polylactic acid (PLA) offers biodegradability and ease of 3D printing, making it suitable for prototype gears with low mechanical stress, but its lower heat resistance and brittleness limit long-term durability. Polyoxymethylene (POM), known for high stiffness, excellent dimensional stability, and superior wear resistance, is ideal for precision gears requiring strength and longevity in demanding mechanical applications. Selecting the right gear material depends on balancing environmental impact, mechanical load, and operational temperature, with POM preferred for industrial gears and PLA suited for eco-friendly, low-stress uses.

Infographic: Polylactic acid vs Polyoxymethylene for Gear