Polylactic acid vs. Polyethylene for food packaging - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Polylactic acid (PLA) offers biodegradable and compostable properties, making it an eco-friendly alternative to traditional polyethylene (PE) in food packaging applications. PE provides superior moisture barrier and mechanical strength but lacks biodegradability, posing environmental challenges.

Table of Comparison

Property Polylactic Acid (PLA) Polyethylene (PE)
Material Type Biodegradable thermoplastic polyester Non-biodegradable thermoplastic polymer
Source Renewable resources (corn starch, sugarcane) Petroleum-based
Biodegradability Compostable under industrial conditions Not biodegradable
Food Safety FDA approved for food contact FDA approved for food contact
Barrier Properties Moderate moisture barrier, low gas barrier Excellent moisture and gas barrier properties
Temperature Resistance Up to 60degC (140degF) Up to 80degC (176degF) depending on grade
Mechanical Strength Lower impact resistance, brittle High flexibility and toughness
Environmental Impact Lower carbon footprint, compostable High carbon footprint, persistent in environment
Cost Generally higher due to renewable sourcing Lower, widely produced

Introduction to Polylactic Acid (PLA) and Polyethylene (PE)

Polylactic acid (PLA) is a biodegradable thermoplastic derived from renewable resources like corn starch and sugarcane, offering eco-friendly alternatives for food packaging with effective barrier properties against moisture and oxygen. Polyethylene (PE), a widely used petroleum-based polymer, provides excellent flexibility, chemical resistance, and a strong moisture barrier, making it a standard choice for various food packaging applications. Comparing PLA and PE highlights differences in biodegradability, environmental impact, and mechanical performance crucial for sustainable packaging solutions.

Chemical Structure and Sources

Polylactic acid (PLA) is a biodegradable polyester derived from renewable resources like corn starch or sugarcane, featuring repeating lactic acid units with ester linkages that provide rigidity and transparency. Polyethylene (PE), a hydrocarbon polymer sourced primarily from fossil fuels, consists of long chains of ethylene monomers with carbon-carbon single bonds, offering flexibility and moisture resistance. The distinct chemical structures influence their environmental impact and suitability for food packaging, with PLA's biodegradability contrasting PE's persistence and durability.

Biodegradability and Environmental Impact

Polylactic acid (PLA) is a biodegradable polymer derived from renewable resources like corn starch, breaking down under industrial composting conditions within months and significantly reducing landfill waste. Polyethylene (PE), a petroleum-based plastic, resists biodegradation and can persist in the environment for centuries, contributing to plastic pollution and microplastic formation. PLA's lower carbon footprint and compostability offer a more sustainable food packaging solution compared to conventional PE, despite limitations in heat resistance and moisture barrier properties.

Mechanical and Barrier Properties

Polylactic acid (PLA) exhibits higher tensile strength but lower elongation at break compared to polyethylene (PE), making it more rigid yet less flexible for food packaging applications. PLA provides moderate barrier properties against oxygen and moisture but generally underperforms relative to PE, which offers superior moisture and oxygen resistance critical for preserving food freshness. The mechanical rigidity of PLA supports structural integrity, while PE's excellent barrier protection enhances shelf life by minimizing gas and vapor transmission.

Food Safety and Regulatory Approvals

Polylactic acid (PLA) offers significant advantages in food safety due to its biodegradability and lower risk of chemical leaching compared to polyethylene (PE), which may release additives under certain conditions. Regulatory approvals for PLA in food packaging are robust, with certifications from the FDA and EFSA affirming its safety for direct food contact, while PE also maintains widespread regulatory acceptance but faces scrutiny over environmental persistence. The choice between PLA and PE often depends on balancing food safety standards, biodegradability goals, and compliance with evolving global food packaging regulations.

Cost Comparison and Economic Viability

Polylactic acid (PLA) typically costs 20-50% more per kilogram than polyethylene (PE), driven by higher raw material and processing expenses linked to its biobased origins. Despite the premium price, PLA's biodegradability and consumer demand for sustainable packaging can enhance brand value and justify initial investment. In large-scale production, cost reductions for PLA are projected due to advances in fermentation technology and increased feedstock availability, potentially narrowing the economic gap with polyethylene over time.

Application Suitability in Food Packaging

Polylactic acid (PLA) offers excellent biodegradability and transparency, making it suitable for short-term food packaging applications such as fresh produce and single-use containers where compostability is prioritized. Polyethylene (PE) demonstrates superior moisture barrier properties and flexibility, ideal for packaging that requires longer shelf life and protection from external contaminants, such as snack foods and frozen products. The choice between PLA and PE depends largely on the packaging duration, environmental goals, and specific food preservation requirements.

Shelf Life and Product Protection

Polylactic acid (PLA) offers moderate oxygen barrier properties that support a shelf life of up to six months for dry food products, but its moisture barrier is inferior compared to polyethylene (PE), which excels in extending shelf life through superior water vapor resistance. Polyethylene, particularly low-density (LDPE) and high-density (HDPE) variants, provides excellent product protection by preventing moisture ingress and maintaining freshness for up to one year or more, making it ideal for perishable and moisture-sensitive foods. The choice between PLA and PE largely depends on the food type and storage conditions, with PE favored for longer shelf life and robust protection, while PLA is chosen for compostability and environmental considerations.

Consumer Perception and Branding

Polylactic acid (PLA) is increasingly perceived by consumers as an eco-friendly alternative to conventional polyethylene (PE) in food packaging, driven by rising environmental awareness and demand for sustainable products. Branding that highlights PLA's biodegradability and renewable origin often enhances consumer trust and willingness to pay a premium, whereas PE is associated with durability but criticized for contributing to plastic pollution. Companies leveraging PLA in packaging capitalize on a green brand image, positioning their products as innovative and responsible, which can lead to stronger brand loyalty and market differentiation.

Future Trends in Sustainable Food Packaging

Polylactic acid (PLA) is emerging as a leading bioplastic in sustainable food packaging due to its compostability and renewable sourcing from corn starch and sugarcane, contrasting with polyethylene's reliance on fossil fuels and challenges in biodegradability. Innovations in PLA formulations are enhancing barrier properties and thermal resistance, positioning it to replace traditional polyethylene in various food packaging applications. Industry trends indicate a growing shift towards bio-based polymers like PLA, supported by regulatory pressures and consumer demand for environmentally friendly packaging solutions.

Polylactic acid vs. Polyethylene for food packaging - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Polylactic acid vs Polyethylene for Food Packaging



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Polylactic acid vs Polyethylene for Food Packaging are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet