Silicone foam vs. polyisocyanurate foam for building insulation - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Silicone foam offers superior flexibility, moisture resistance, and durability compared to polyisocyanurate foam, making it ideal for building insulation in humid or dynamic environments. Polyisocyanurate foam provides higher thermal resistance (R-value) and fire retardancy, often preferred for energy-efficient, rigid insulation panels in commercial construction.

Table of Comparison

Property Silicone Foam Polyisocyanurate (PIR) Foam
Thermal Insulation (R-value) Moderate, approx. R-3.5 per inch High, approx. R-6 to R-6.5 per inch
Fire Resistance Excellent, self-extinguishing, UL94 V-0 rating Good, limited combustibility, often treated with fire retardants
Moisture Resistance High, hydrophobic and resistant to water absorption Moderate, potential for moisture absorption unless laminated
Durability & Longevity Superior flexibility and resilience, resists cracking and aging Rigid, good dimensional stability but may become brittle over time
Environmental Impact Often low VOC, recyclable, but energy-intensive production Contains blowing agents with global warming potential, some versions eco-friendly
Cost Higher initial cost due to specialized materials Generally more economical, widely available
Applications Ideal for sealing, flexible insulation, weatherproofing in complex shapes Used for rigid board insulation, roof decking, and structural panels

Introduction to Building Insulation Materials

Silicone foam and polyisocyanurate foam represent advanced building insulation materials known for their thermal resistance and durability. Silicone foam offers superior flexibility and resistance to moisture, making it ideal for areas prone to movement or damp conditions. Polyisocyanurate foam provides high R-values per inch, ensuring excellent thermal performance and fire resistance in rigid board insulation applications.

Overview of Silicone Foam

Silicone foam offers exceptional thermal stability and flexibility, making it highly effective for building insulation in environments with extreme temperature fluctuations. Its closed-cell structure provides excellent moisture resistance and durability, reducing heat transfer and preventing mold growth. Unlike polyisocyanurate foam, silicone foam maintains its properties over a wider temperature range and resists UV degradation, enhancing the longevity of insulation systems.

Overview of Polyisocyanurate (PIR) Foam

Polyisocyanurate (PIR) foam is a rigid, closed-cell insulation material widely used in building construction for its high thermal resistance and fire retardant properties. It offers superior energy efficiency due to its low thermal conductivity, typically between 0.022 and 0.028 W/m*K, making it ideal for walls, roofs, and floors. PIR foam also demonstrates excellent moisture and chemical resistance, contributing to long-term durability and reduced thermal bridging compared to silicone foam alternatives.

Thermal Insulation Performance Comparison

Silicone foam exhibits superior thermal insulation properties due to its low thermal conductivity, typically around 0.02 W/m*K, making it highly effective in reducing heat transfer in building envelopes. Polyisocyanurate foam also offers excellent insulation with thermal conductivity values ranging from 0.019 to 0.023 W/m*K, but it may degrade at higher temperatures, impacting long-term performance. The choice between silicone and polyisocyanurate foam depends on specific temperature resistance requirements and desired R-value performance within the building insulation system.

Moisture Resistance and Durability

Silicone foam offers superior moisture resistance compared to polyisocyanurate foam, making it ideal for environments with high humidity or exposure to water. Polyisocyanurate foam provides excellent thermal insulation but can degrade faster when exposed to moisture, compromising its long-term durability. Silicone foam's inherent hydrophobic properties contribute to its resilience and extended service life in building insulation applications where moisture control is critical.

Fire Resistance and Safety Ratings

Silicone foam demonstrates superior fire resistance compared to polyisocyanurate foam, with higher ignition temperatures and lower smoke toxicity, making it a safer option for building insulation in fire-prone environments. Polyisocyanurate foam, while offering good thermal insulation, typically exhibits lower fire safety ratings due to its combustible nature and the potential release of toxic gases during combustion. Building codes often favor silicone foam for applications requiring enhanced fire safety and compliance with strict fire resistance standards such as ASTM E84 and UL 94.

Environmental Impact and Sustainability

Silicone foam offers superior environmental resistance and durability, which reduces the frequency of replacement and waste production compared to Polyisocyanurate foam, known for its higher thermal insulation but greater environmental footprint due to blowing agents with higher global warming potential. Polyisocyanurate foam typically has a higher R-value per inch, contributing to energy savings, yet its chemical composition and end-of-life disposal challenges impact sustainability negatively. Lifecycle assessments favor silicone foam for long-term use in eco-friendly building projects, emphasizing low VOC emissions and improved recyclability.

Cost and Installation Considerations

Silicone foam offers higher flexibility and weather resistance but often comes at a higher initial cost compared to polyisocyanurate foam, which is generally more affordable and widely used in building insulation. Polyisocyanurate foam provides excellent thermal performance with an R-value typically around 6 to 6.5 per inch, making it cost-effective for large-scale applications, while silicone foam's installation is easier in complex shapes due to its malleability. Installation of silicone foam can require specialized equipment and expertise, increasing labor costs, whereas polyisocyanurate panels are easier to cut and fit with standard tools, reducing installation time and expense.

Applications in Residential and Commercial Buildings

Silicone foam excels in residential and commercial building insulation due to its superior flexibility, water resistance, and thermal stability, making it ideal for sealing gaps and providing air barriers. Polyisocyanurate foam offers higher R-values per inch and exceptional fire resistance, often used in roof and wall insulation systems for enhanced energy efficiency and code compliance. Both materials contribute to improved building envelope performance, with silicone foam favored for sealing and polyisocyanurate for structural insulation layers.

Choosing the Right Insulation: Silicone vs. Polyisocyanurate

Silicone foam offers superior flexibility and excellent resistance to moisture and UV degradation, making it ideal for exterior building insulation where environmental exposure is significant. Polyisocyanurate foam provides higher R-value per inch, delivering exceptional thermal insulation performance, especially in walls and roofs requiring maximum energy efficiency. Selecting between silicone and polyisocyanurate foam depends on project-specific factors like climate, exposure conditions, and desired thermal resistance for optimized building insulation.

Silicone foam vs. polyisocyanurate foam for building insulation - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Silicone foam vs Polyisocyanurate foam for Building insulation



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Silicone foam vs Polyisocyanurate foam for Building insulation are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet