Polyisoprene rubber vs. fluoroelastomer for chemical seal - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Polyisoprene rubber offers excellent flexibility and abrasion resistance, making it suitable for general-purpose chemical seals with mild exposure. Fluoroelastomer provides superior chemical and heat resistance, ideal for seals exposed to harsh chemicals and high temperatures in industrial applications.

Table of Comparison

Property Polyisoprene Rubber (IR) Fluoroelastomer (FKM)
Chemical Resistance Moderate resistance; vulnerable to oils, fuels, and solvents Excellent resistance to oils, fuels, chemicals, and high-temperature fluids
Temperature Range -50degC to 70degC (-58degF to 158degF) -20degC to 200degC (-4degF to 392degF)
Durability Good tensile strength, low abrasion resistance High tensile strength, superior abrasion and weather resistance
Applications General sealing, mild chemical exposure Chemical seals requiring high resistance to aggressive fluids and heat
Cost Lower cost, economical for standard sealing Higher cost, justified by superior performance

Introduction to Polyisoprene Rubber and Fluoroelastomer

Polyisoprene rubber, a natural elastomer derived from latex, offers excellent flexibility, high tensile strength, and good abrasion resistance, making it suitable for sealing applications with moderate chemical exposure. Fluoroelastomers, synthetic polymers known for exceptional resistance to heat, oils, fuels, and aggressive chemicals, provide superior durability in harsh chemical environments. Selecting between polyisoprene rubber and fluoroelastomer for chemical seals depends on the required chemical resistance, temperature range, and mechanical properties for specific industrial applications.

Chemical Resistance Comparison

Polyisoprene rubber offers moderate chemical resistance, performing well against water, alcohols, and some dilute acids but degrading rapidly when exposed to oils, fuels, and strong solvents. Fluoroelastomer exhibits superior chemical resistance, maintaining integrity under harsh conditions including exposure to hydrocarbons, acids, bases, and aggressive solvents, making it ideal for demanding chemical seal applications. The comparative durability of fluoroelastomer significantly extends seal lifespan in aggressive chemical environments compared to polyisoprene rubber.

Temperature Stability and Performance

Polyisoprene rubber exhibits moderate temperature stability, typically withstanding continuous use up to 80degC, making it suitable for less demanding chemical seal applications. Fluoroelastomers, such as Viton, offer superior temperature resistance, maintaining performance in environments ranging from -26degC to 205degC, ideal for seals exposed to aggressive chemicals and high temperatures. The chemical resistance and thermal stability of fluoroelastomers dramatically enhance seal durability and reliability in demanding industrial processes compared to polyisoprene rubber.

Mechanical Properties and Durability

Polyisoprene rubber offers excellent tensile strength and flexibility, making it ideal for dynamic sealing applications requiring high resilience and fatigue resistance. Fluoroelastomers, possessing superior chemical resistance and thermal stability, outperform polyisoprene in aggressive environments with exposure to oils, fuels, and solvents, maintaining elasticity at elevated temperatures up to 200degC. Durability in chemical seals is enhanced in fluoroelastomers due to their resistance to degradation from oxidation and swelling, whereas polyisoprene may exhibit faster mechanical wear and chemical breakdown under harsh conditions.

Compatibility with Industrial Chemicals

Polyisoprene rubber offers excellent flexibility and abrasion resistance but has limited chemical compatibility, performing poorly with oils, fuels, and many solvents commonly found in industrial environments. Fluoroelastomer (FKM) provides superior resistance to a wide range of industrial chemicals including hydrocarbons, acids, and solvents, making it a preferred choice for chemical seals exposed to aggressive media. The chemical stability and temperature resistance of fluoroelastomers ensure extended seal life and reduced risk of degradation in harsh chemical applications.

Applications in Chemical Sealing

Polyisoprene rubber offers excellent elasticity and resistance to water and alcohols, making it suitable for general chemical sealing applications with moderate exposure to oils and fuels. Fluoroelastomer excels in aggressive chemical environments, providing superior resistance to hydrocarbons, acids, and high temperatures, ideal for seals in automotive, aerospace, and chemical processing industries. Selecting between polyisoprene and fluoroelastomer depends on the specific chemical compatibility requirements, temperature ranges, and mechanical demands of the sealing application.

Cost Analysis and Availability

Polyisoprene rubber offers a cost-effective solution with moderate chemical resistance, making it suitable for less aggressive environments, and is widely available due to its common use in various industries. Fluoroelastomer provides superior chemical resistance and high-temperature tolerance but comes at a significantly higher cost and limited availability, often reserved for specialized applications requiring enhanced durability. The choice between them hinges on balancing budget constraints against performance requirements and material accessibility in chemical seal applications.

Ease of Processing and Manufacturing

Polyisoprene rubber offers superior ease of processing due to its excellent elasticity and compatibility with standard rubber compounding techniques, resulting in faster mold cycle times and simplified manufacturing workflows. Fluoroelastomer, while providing exceptional chemical resistance, requires more complex curing systems and precise temperature control during vulcanization, which can increase production time and cost. The choice between polyisoprene and fluoroelastomer depends on balancing processing efficiency with the chemical performance demands of the seal application.

Environmental and Safety Considerations

Polyisoprene rubber offers superior biodegradability and lower environmental impact compared to fluoroelastomers, which contain fluorinated compounds known for persistence and potential bioaccumulation. Fluoroelastomers exhibit exceptional chemical resistance and thermal stability, reducing risks of degradation and leaks in harsh chemical seal applications, enhancing operational safety. Selecting polyisoprene prioritizes eco-friendly disposal and reduced toxicity, while fluoroelastomers favor long-term durability and containment safety in aggressive environments.

Choosing the Best Seal Material: Polyisoprene vs Fluoroelastomer

Polyisoprene rubber offers excellent resilience and good abrasion resistance, making it suitable for seals in applications with moderate chemical exposure and dynamic movement. Fluoroelastomer stands out for superior chemical resistance, particularly against hydrocarbons, oils, and acids, ensuring longevity in harsh environments. Selecting the best seal material depends on the chemical compatibility requirements and temperature range, with fluoroelastomer favored for aggressive chemicals and high temperatures, while polyisoprene suits less demanding conditions with enhanced elasticity.

Polyisoprene rubber vs. fluoroelastomer for chemical seal - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Polyisoprene rubber vs Fluoroelastomer for Chemical seal



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Polyisoprene rubber vs Fluoroelastomer for Chemical seal are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet