Fluorosilicone vs. Buna-N for Aerospace Seal - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Fluorosilicone offers superior chemical resistance, high-temperature tolerance up to 230degC, and excellent fuel and oil compatibility, making it ideal for aerospace seals exposed to harsh environments. Buna-N provides good abrasion resistance and low gas permeability but has lower temperature limits around 120degC, limiting its use in high-temperature aerospace applications.

Table of Comparison

Property Fluorosilicone Buna-N (Nitrile)
Temperature Range -60degC to 230degC -40degC to 120degC
Chemical Resistance Excellent resistance to fuels, oils, and solvents Good resistance to petroleum oils and fuels
Oil & Fuel Compatibility Superior for aerospace fuel systems Standard for general fuel applications
Compression Set Resistance Better long-term sealing under pressure Moderate resistance, may degrade faster
Flexibility at Low Temperatures Maintains elasticity below -50degC Becomes brittle below -30degC
Cost Higher initial cost Lower cost, widely used
Application Suitability Ideal for high-performance aerospace seals exposed to harsh chemicals and temperature extremes Suitable for less demanding aerospace applications with moderate chemical exposure

Introduction to Aerospace Sealing Materials

Fluorosilicone and Buna-N are critical aerospace sealing materials selected for their distinct chemical and thermal resistance properties. Fluorosilicone excels in high-temperature environments up to 230degC and offers superior resistance to aviation fuels, hydraulic fluids, and lubricants compared to Buna-N, which typically operates effectively up to 120degC with strong oil and fuel resistance. Choosing between fluorosilicone and Buna-N depends on specific aerospace sealing requirements such as temperature range, fluid compatibility, and mechanical robustness.

Overview of Fluorosilicone Elastomers

Fluorosilicone elastomers exhibit exceptional resistance to high temperatures, fuels, oils, and environmental conditions, making them ideal for aerospace seals exposed to harsh operational environments. Their unique silicone backbone combined with fluorinated side groups enhances chemical stability and fuel resistance, outperforming Buna-N elastomers in applications involving jet fuels and hydraulic fluids. Fluorosilicone seals maintain flexibility and sealing integrity across a wide temperature range from -60degC to 230degC, crucial for aerospace components subjected to extreme thermal cycling.

Key Properties of Buna-N (Nitrile)

Buna-N (Nitrile) seals offer excellent resistance to petroleum-based oils, fuels, and hydraulic fluids, making them ideal for aerospace applications involving fuel systems and lubricants. This elastomer provides superior tensile strength and abrasion resistance, ensuring durability under extreme mechanical stress and temperature variations ranging from -40degC to 120degC. Its cost-effectiveness and moderate chemical resistance complement aerospace sealing requirements where exposure to aggressive solvents and fuel vapors is limited compared to Fluorosilicone.

Chemical Resistance: Fluorosilicone vs Buna-N

Fluorosilicone offers superior chemical resistance compared to Buna-N, especially against fuels, oils, and solvents used in aerospace applications. Buna-N, or nitrile rubber, performs well with hydrocarbons but degrades rapidly when exposed to ketones, esters, and ozone, limiting its aerospace utility. Fluorosilicone's resilience to aggressive aviation fluids and its wide temperature range make it the preferred choice for demanding aerospace seals requiring long-term chemical stability.

Temperature Performance Comparison

Fluorosilicone seals in aerospace applications offer excellent temperature resistance, operating effectively between -65degF to 400degF (-54degC to 204degC), making them suitable for extreme thermal environments. Buna-N (Nitrile) seals, however, have a narrower temperature range, typically from -40degF to 250degF (-40degC to 121degC), limiting their use in high-temperature aerospace systems. The superior thermal stability of Fluorosilicone ensures prolonged performance under fluctuating temperatures, enhancing seal durability in aerospace components exposed to harsh conditions.

Application Suitability in Aerospace Environments

Fluorosilicone seals exhibit exceptional resistance to extreme temperatures ranging from -75degF to 400degF, making them highly suitable for aerospace applications involving exposure to jet fuels, hydraulic fluids, and harsh environmental conditions. Buna-N seals, while offering good resistance to petroleum-based oils and fuels, typically operate effectively within a narrower temperature window of -40degF to 250degF, limiting their use in more demanding aerospace environments. The superior chemical stability and wide temperature tolerance of fluorosilicone provide enhanced durability and reliability in aerospace seal applications where exposure to aggressive fuels and extreme conditions is prevalent.

Fluid Compatibility: Fuels, Oils, and Hydraulic Fluids

Fluorosilicone seals excel in aerospace applications requiring superior resistance to hydrocarbon-based fuels, oils, and hydraulic fluids, maintaining performance in temperatures ranging from -60degC to 230degC. Buna-N (Nitrile) seals offer good compatibility with petroleum oils and fuels but degrade faster when exposed to synthetic oils and aggressive hydraulic fluids like Skydrol. Fluorosilicone's molecular structure provides enhanced chemical resistance against jet fuels (Jet A, JP-5), phosphate ester fluids, and lubricants, making it a preferred choice where fluid compatibility and long-term durability are critical.

Durability and Longevity in Service

Fluorosilicone offers superior chemical resistance and thermal stability compared to Buna-N, making it highly durable in aerospace seals exposed to extreme temperatures and aggressive fuels. Buna-N, while cost-effective and resilient against oils and fuels, tends to degrade faster under prolonged exposure to high heat and oxidative environments. The longevity of fluorosilicone seals significantly outperforms Buna-N in aerospace applications requiring extended service life and reliability under harsh operating conditions.

Cost Considerations and Availability

Fluorosilicone seals, while offering superior chemical resistance and temperature range for aerospace applications, typically come at a higher cost compared to Buna-N (Nitrile) seals, which are more economically priced and widely available. Buna-N enjoys broader availability due to its extensive use in various industries, making it a cost-effective option for general sealing purposes in aerospace when chemical exposure is limited. Choosing between Fluorosilicone and Buna-N hinges on balancing budget constraints against performance requirements and supply chain accessibility.

Selecting the Right Seal Material for Aerospace

Fluorosilicone offers superior resistance to a wide range of fuels, oils, and high temperatures, making it ideal for aerospace seals exposed to harsh chemical environments and extreme thermal cycles. Buna-N (Nitrile) provides excellent abrasion resistance and cost-effectiveness but has limited performance in high-temperature and fuel resistance applications compared to Fluorosilicone. Selecting the right seal material requires evaluating operational temperature ranges, chemical exposure, and mechanical stress to ensure reliability and safety in aerospace systems.

Fluorosilicone vs. Buna-N for Aerospace Seal - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Fluorosilicone vs Buna-N for Aerospace seal



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Fluorosilicone vs Buna-N for Aerospace seal are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet