Polyoxymethylene vs. Polyethylene Naphthalate for Film Substrate - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Polyoxymethylene (POM) offers high dimensional stability and mechanical strength, making it ideal for precision film substrates. Polyethylene Naphthalate (PEN) provides superior thermal resistance and barrier properties, enhancing film performance in high-temperature and moisture-sensitive applications.

Table of Comparison

Property Polyoxymethylene (POM) Polyethylene Naphthalate (PEN)
Material Type Engineering Thermoplastic High-Performance Polyester
Application Film Substrate for Mechanical Parts Film Substrate for Electronic & Optical Uses
Mechanical Strength High Tensile & Impact Strength Moderate Strength, High Dimensional Stability
Thermal Stability Melting Point ~175degC Melting Point ~270degC; Excellent Thermal Resistance
Moisture Absorption Low to Moderate Very Low
Chemical Resistance Good Resistance to Fuels and Solvents Excellent Resistance to Chemicals and Hydrolysis
Electrical Properties Good Insulation Superior Electrical Insulation & Stability
Transparency Opaque to Translucent Transparent, Clear Film
Cost Moderate Higher Cost

Introduction to Polyoxymethylene and Polyethylene Naphthalate

Polyoxymethylene (POM) is a highly crystalline thermoplastic known for its excellent mechanical strength, dimensional stability, and low friction, making it suitable for precision film substrates requiring durability. Polyethylene Naphthalate (PEN) is a polyester film substrate recognized for its superior thermal resistance, chemical stability, and excellent barrier properties, commonly used in flexible electronics and high-performance packaging. Comparing POM and PEN for film substrates highlights differences in thermal tolerance, mechanical robustness, and optical clarity, which influence their selection in advanced industrial applications.

Chemical Structure and Composition

Polyoxymethylene (POM) features a linear structure of repeating -CH2O- units, providing high crystallinity and rigidity due to its strong acetal linkages. Polyethylene Naphthalate (PEN) consists of aromatic naphthalene rings in its backbone, granting superior thermal stability and chemical resistance compared to aliphatic polymers. The presence of rigid benzene-based moieties in PEN enhances tensile strength and barrier properties, making it more suitable for demanding film substrates than the semi-crystalline ether-based structure of POM.

Mechanical Properties Comparison

Polyoxymethylene (POM) offers high stiffness with excellent dimensional stability and impact resistance, making it suitable for mechanical applications requiring durability. Polyethylene Naphthalate (PEN) exhibits superior tensile strength and thermal stability while maintaining good flexibility, ideal for films subjected to heat and mechanical stress. Mechanical properties comparison reveals POM excels in rigidity and abrasion resistance, whereas PEN provides enhanced strength-to-weight ratio and better performance in high-temperature environments.

Thermal Stability and Heat Resistance

Polyoxymethylene (POM) exhibits moderate thermal stability with a melting point around 175degC, making it suitable for applications requiring good heat resistance but limited exposure to high temperatures. Polyethylene Naphthalate (PEN) outperforms POM in thermal stability, featuring a higher glass transition temperature near 120degC and melting point exceeding 270degC, which enhances its suitability for high-temperature film substrate applications. PEN's superior heat resistance ensures dimensional stability and performance retention under prolonged thermal stress, whereas POM may degrade or deform under similar conditions.

Barrier Properties: Gas and Moisture Permeability

Polyoxymethylene (POM) exhibits moderate gas and moisture barrier properties, making it suitable for applications requiring durability but less stringent permeability control. Polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) offers superior barrier performance with significantly lower oxygen and moisture vapor transmission rates due to its dense aromatic polymer structure. PEN's enhanced barrier properties make it the preferred film substrate in high-barrier packaging and electronic applications where gas and moisture resistance are critical.

Optical Clarity and Surface Finish

Polyoxymethylene (POM) offers moderate optical clarity but excels in smooth surface finish due to its high crystallinity and low surface roughness, making it suitable for applications demanding precise dimensional stability and a glossy appearance. Polyethylene Naphthalate (PEN) exhibits superior optical clarity with excellent light transmission and low haze, ideal for transparent film substrates requiring high-performance barrier properties. Surface finish in PEN films tends to be inherently smooth with good gloss retention, supporting its use in advanced optical and electronic devices where both clarity and durability are critical.

Processing Techniques and Film Fabrication

Polyoxymethylene (POM) offers excellent dimensional stability and low friction, making it suitable for precise film extrusion processes such as melt casting and biaxial orientation, which enhance mechanical strength and surface uniformity. Polyethylene Naphthalate (PEN) exhibits superior thermal stability and chemical resistance, enabling advanced processing techniques like extrusion coating and stretch blow molding to produce films with excellent barrier properties and high tensile strength. Both polymers require careful control of cooling rates and annealing steps during film fabrication to optimize crystallinity and achieve desired optical clarity and mechanical performance.

Environmental Impact and Recyclability

Polyoxymethylene (POM) offers high mechanical strength but poses challenges in recyclability due to its chemical stability and limited recycling streams, impacting its environmental footprint negatively. Polyethylene Naphthalate (PEN), known for its superior thermal stability and barrier properties, supports more efficient recycling processes aligned with PET infrastructures, reducing waste and energy consumption in film substrate applications. PEN's biodegradability and higher resistance to chemical degradation contribute to a lower environmental impact compared to POM, making it a more sustainable choice for film substrates.

Cost Analysis and Market Availability

Polyoxymethylene (POM) films typically offer lower raw material costs and easier manufacturing processes compared to Polyethylene Naphthalate (PEN), which commands a higher price due to its superior thermal stability and chemical resistance. Market availability favors PEN films in high-performance applications like flexible electronics and high-temperature insulation, supported by specialized suppliers, whereas POM films are widely accessible for cost-sensitive packaging and industrial uses. Cost analysis reveals that while PEN films require higher initial investment, their long-term durability can reduce total lifecycle expenses in niche markets.

Applications in Film Substrate Industry

Polyoxymethylene (POM) offers excellent dimensional stability and low moisture absorption, making it ideal for high-precision film substrates in electronics and packaging applications. Polyethylene Naphthalate (PEN) provides superior thermal resistance, mechanical strength, and excellent barrier properties, widely used for flexible printed circuit boards, display films, and solar cell encapsulation. The choice between POM and PEN depends on the specific requirements for temperature stability, chemical resistance, and durability in the film substrate industry.

Polyoxymethylene vs. Polyethylene Naphthalate for Film Substrate - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Polyoxymethylene vs Polyethylene Naphthalate for Film Substrate



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Polyoxymethylene vs Polyethylene Naphthalate for Film Substrate are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet