Polylactic acid foam vs. elastomeric foam for soundproofing - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Polylactic acid foam offers eco-friendly, biodegradable soundproofing with moderate acoustic insulation, while elastomeric foam provides superior noise reduction and durability due to its flexible, closed-cell structure. Elastomeric foam's enhanced vibration damping and moisture resistance make it preferred for industrial and commercial soundproofing applications.

Table of Comparison

Feature Polylactic Acid (PLA) Foam Elastomeric Foam
Material Type Biodegradable thermoplastic polyester Synthetic rubber-based foam
Soundproofing Efficiency Moderate sound absorption, effective for mid-frequency noise High sound absorption, excels in low to high frequencies
Density Low to medium density (20-80 kg/m3) Medium to high density (100-200 kg/m3)
Durability Lower durability, prone to degradation over time High durability, resistant to weather and UV exposure
Environmental Impact Biodegradable, eco-friendly Non-biodegradable, but recyclable
Thermal Resistance Moderate thermal insulation Excellent thermal insulation and fire resistance
Cost Moderate, depends on biodegradability and sourcing Higher cost due to synthetic composition and performance
Common Applications Eco-friendly sound panels, packaging, lightweight insulation Building insulation, HVAC systems, automotive soundproofing

Introduction to Soundproofing Materials

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam and elastomeric foam are widely used soundproofing materials, each offering distinct acoustic properties. PLA foam, derived from biodegradable polymers, provides effective noise absorption with sustainable benefits and a lightweight structure. Elastomeric foam, known for its flexibility and durability, excels in vibration damping and impact noise reduction, making it ideal for both commercial and industrial soundproofing applications.

Overview of Polylactic Acid (PLA) Foam

Polylactic Acid (PLA) foam is a biodegradable, eco-friendly soundproofing material derived from renewable resources such as corn starch or sugarcane, offering a sustainable alternative to traditional foams. It exhibits excellent acoustic absorption properties due to its cellular structure, effectively reducing noise transmission in residential and commercial applications. Compared to elastomeric foam, PLA foam provides a lightweight solution with competitive thermal insulation and sound dampening performance while emphasizing environmental benefits.

Overview of Elastomeric Foam

Elastomeric foam is a flexible, closed-cell material commonly used in soundproofing for its excellent noise absorption and thermal insulation properties. Its cellular structure effectively reduces airborne noise and vibrations, making it ideal for HVAC ducts, walls, and ceilings. Compared to polylactic acid foam, elastomeric foam offers superior durability, moisture resistance, and long-term performance in diverse environmental conditions.

Acoustic Properties: PLA Foam vs Elastomeric Foam

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam offers moderate sound absorption with its lightweight, biodegradable structure, making it suitable for eco-friendly soundproofing applications where environmental impact is a priority. Elastomeric foam exhibits superior acoustic properties due to its flexible, closed-cell structure, providing excellent sound dampening and vibration isolation across a wide frequency range. The density and tensile strength of elastomeric foam contribute to enhanced noise reduction compared to the more rigid and less elastic PLA foam.

Sound Absorption Efficiency Comparison

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam exhibits moderate sound absorption efficiency, particularly effective in mid to high-frequency ranges due to its rigid cellular structure. Elastomeric foam demonstrates superior soundproofing performance across a broader frequency spectrum, especially excelling in low-frequency sound attenuation because of its flexible, porous matrix. Comparative studies reveal elastomeric foam's noise reduction coefficient (NRC) often surpasses PLA foam, making it more efficient for comprehensive acoustic insulation applications.

Environmental Impact and Sustainability

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam demonstrates superior environmental benefits compared to elastomeric foam due to its biodegradable and compostable nature, derived from renewable resources like corn starch or sugarcane. Elastomeric foam, typically made from non-renewable petrochemicals, poses challenges in disposal and contributes to long-term environmental pollution. PLA foam's closed-loop lifecycle and reduced carbon footprint make it a more sustainable choice in soundproofing applications focused on ecological impact.

Installation and Application Differences

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam offers lightweight, biodegradable soundproofing ideal for temporary or eco-friendly installations, whereas elastomeric foam provides superior durability and flexibility suited for permanent applications and harsh environments. PLA foam typically requires less specialized tools for cutting and fitting, making it easier for quick setups, while elastomeric foam demands precise handling due to its dense structure and adhesive compatibility for long-term sealing. The application of elastomeric foam excels in industrial and HVAC soundproofing due to its resistance to moisture and temperature fluctuations, contrasted with PLA foam's preference for residential or low-impact acoustic damping.

Durability and Maintenance Considerations

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam offers moderate durability with biodegradability, requiring less chemical maintenance but is prone to degradation under prolonged moisture exposure. Elastomeric foam exhibits superior durability with high resistance to moisture, UV, and temperature variations, reducing upkeep and extending lifespan in soundproofing applications. Maintenance for elastomeric foam is generally minimal, involving occasional cleaning, whereas PLA foam may need more frequent inspections and replacements in humid environments.

Cost Analysis: PLA vs Elastomeric Foam

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam generally offers a lower material cost compared to elastomeric foam, making it a budget-friendly option for soundproofing applications. Elastomeric foam, however, often incurs higher initial costs due to its superior acoustic performance and durability, potentially reducing long-term expenses through less frequent replacement. Evaluating the total cost of ownership requires considering factors such as installation, lifespan, and acoustic efficiency alongside material price.

Choosing the Right Foam for Soundproofing Needs

Polylactic acid foam offers excellent biodegradability and moderate sound absorption, making it suitable for eco-friendly acoustic solutions with lower-frequency noise control. Elastomeric foam provides superior flexibility, durability, and high noise-reduction coefficients, ideal for industrial or commercial soundproofing requiring long-term performance and resistance to environmental factors. Selecting the right foam depends on balancing environmental impact, sound absorption efficiency, and application-specific durability requirements.

Polylactic acid foam vs. elastomeric foam for soundproofing - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Polylactic acid foam vs Elastomeric foam for Soundproofing



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Polylactic acid foam vs Elastomeric foam for Soundproofing are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet