E-glass fiber vs. Basalt fiber for Structural Composites - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

E-fiber offers superior tensile strength and lightweight properties compared to basalt fiber, making it ideal for high-performance structural composites. Basalt fiber provides enhanced thermal resistance and cost-effectiveness, suitable for applications requiring durability in harsh environments.

Table of Comparison

Property E-Glass Fiber Basalt Fiber
Tensile Strength 2.5 - 3.5 GPa 2.8 - 4.8 GPa
Young's Modulus 72 - 76 GPa 85 - 105 GPa
Density 2.54 g/cm3 2.7 - 2.9 g/cm3
Thermal Stability Up to 540degC Up to 650degC
Chemical Resistance Moderate High
Cost Lower Higher
Application in Structural Composites Widely used for moderate strength and flexibility Preferred for high strength and thermal resistance

Introduction to E-Fiber and Basalt Fiber

E-fibers, made from finely drawn glass fibers, offer high tensile strength, lightweight properties, and excellent electrical insulation, making them ideal for structural composites in aerospace and automotive industries. Basalt fiber, derived from volcanic rock, provides superior heat resistance, chemical stability, and sustainability advantages due to its natural origin and eco-friendly production. Both fibers enhance composite materials' mechanical performance, with E-fibers excelling in electrical applications and basalt fibers preferred for high-temperature and corrosion-resistant environments.

Material Composition and Properties

E-glass fiber, composed primarily of alumino-borosilicate glass, offers high tensile strength, excellent electrical insulation, and good chemical resistance, making it a common choice for structural composites. Basalt fiber, derived from natural volcanic rock, exhibits superior temperature resistance, higher modulus of elasticity, and enhanced impact resistance compared to E-glass, while also providing excellent corrosion and chemical stability. The inherent differences in material composition lead to distinct mechanical properties, with basalt fiber showing better durability and thermal performance, whereas E-glass fiber excels in cost-effectiveness and ease of manufacturing.

Mechanical Strength Comparison

E-glass fiber exhibits higher tensile strength, typically ranging from 2.5 to 3.5 GPa, compared to basalt fiber's tensile strength of approximately 2.8 to 3.1 GPa, making E-fiber more suitable for applications requiring superior mechanical strength. Basalt fiber offers better compressive strength and enhanced resistance to impact and thermal stability, which can be advantageous in structural composites subjected to harsh environments. The modulus of elasticity for E-glass fiber is around 70-73 GPa, closely matching basalt fiber's 85-90 GPa, indicating comparable stiffness properties for load-bearing applications.

Durability and Environmental Resistance

Basalt fiber exhibits superior durability and environmental resistance compared to E-fiber, maintaining structural integrity under high temperatures and aggressive chemical exposures commonly encountered in composite applications. E-fiber, primarily composed of alumino-borosilicate glass, shows moderate resistance to moisture and UV radiation but is prone to degradation in alkaline environments, limiting its long-term performance. Basalt fiber's enhanced resistance to corrosion, thermal stability up to 700degC, and natural origin make it a preferred choice for structural composites requiring prolonged service life and sustainable material characteristics.

Weight-to-Strength Ratio Analysis

E-glass fiber (E-fiber) and basalt fiber offer distinct advantages in structural composites, with basalt fiber exhibiting superior weight-to-strength ratio due to its higher tensile strength ranging from 2.8 to 3.1 GPa compared to E-fiber's 2.4 GPa. Basalt fiber's density of approximately 2.7 g/cm3 closely matches E-fiber's 2.5 g/cm3, yet its enhanced mechanical properties lead to improved load-bearing capacity without significant weight increase. This optimization makes basalt fiber preferable for lightweight, high-strength composite applications in aerospace, automotive, and civil engineering sectors.

Cost Efficiency and Availability

E-fiber offers high cost efficiency due to its lower raw material costs and energy-efficient manufacturing process compared to basalt fiber, making it an economical choice for structural composites. Basalt fiber, derived from abundant natural volcanic rock, has strong market availability but generally comes at a higher price point due to more intensive production methods. For large-scale applications requiring budget-friendly materials, E-fiber often provides a better balance between performance and cost, whereas basalt fiber is preferred where superior thermal and chemical resistance is critical despite the premium expense.

Manufacturing and Processing Techniques

E-fiber composites benefit from well-established manufacturing techniques such as filament winding, pultrusion, and resin transfer molding that allow precise control over fiber orientation and resin impregnation, resulting in lightweight and high-strength structural components. Basalt fiber composites require specialized processing adjustments due to their higher melting point and stiffness, often involving higher-temperature curing cycles and modified resin systems to enhance fiber-matrix bonding and durability in structural applications. Advances in automated placement and hybrid layup methods have optimized the processing efficiency and mechanical performance of both fiber types in structural composite manufacturing.

Applications in Structural Composites

E-fiber and basalt fiber are increasingly utilized in structural composites due to their superior mechanical properties and durability. E-fiber, known for its high tensile strength and electrical insulation, is widely applied in aerospace and automotive components where lightweight and strength are critical. Basalt fiber offers excellent thermal stability and chemical resistance, making it ideal for infrastructure, marine, and construction applications requiring enhanced fire resistance and environmental durability.

Sustainability and Environmental Impact

E-fiber composites offer lightweight properties and good electrical insulation but rely heavily on energy-intensive glass manufacturing processes, raising environmental concerns. Basalt fiber, derived from natural volcanic rock, presents a more sustainable alternative with lower carbon footprint and superior recyclability, enhancing its appeal for green structural composites. The inherent biodegradability and abundance of basalt rock contribute to reduced ecological impact compared to synthetic E-fiber production.

Final Considerations and Recommendations

E-fiber offers superior electrical insulation and lightweight properties, making it ideal for applications requiring high electrical performance and corrosion resistance in structural composites. Basalt fiber provides enhanced thermal stability, mechanical strength, and environmental durability, suited for heavy-duty structural components exposed to extreme conditions. For final considerations, select E-fiber when electrical insulation and weight reduction are critical, while basalt fiber is recommended for robust, high-temperature, and chemically aggressive environments in structural composites.

E-glass fiber vs. Basalt fiber for Structural Composites - What is The Difference?

Infographic: E-fiber vs Basalt fiber for Structural Composite



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about E-fiber vs Basalt fiber for Structural Composite are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet