Polybutylene terephthalate vs. Polyphenylene sulfide for electrical component - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) offers excellent electrical insulation and chemical resistance, making it ideal for electrical connectors and housings. Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) provides superior thermal stability and flame retardancy, suited for high-temperature electrical components in automotive and industrial applications.

Table of Comparison

Property Polybutylene Terephthalate (PBT) Polyphenylene Sulfide (PPS)
Thermal Resistance Up to 150degC continuous use Up to 260degC continuous use
Mechanical Strength High tensile strength, good impact resistance Excellent mechanical strength, superior dimensional stability
Chemical Resistance Good resistance to hydrocarbons and solvents Outstanding resistance to chemicals and solvents
Electrical Properties Good electrical insulation, dielectric strength ~20 kV/mm Excellent electrical insulation, dielectric strength ~25 kV/mm
Moisture Absorption Moderate (~0.4-0.5%) Low (<0.05%)
Processing Injection molding, extrusion Injection molding, compression molding
Typical Applications Electrical connectors, housings, switches High-performance connectors, circuit breaker parts, automotive sensors
Cost Lower cost Higher cost

Introduction to Polybutylene Terephthalate and Polyphenylene Sulfide

Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) is a thermoplastic polymer known for its excellent electrical insulation, chemical resistance, and dimensional stability, making it ideal for electrical components such as connectors and housings. Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) offers superior thermal stability, flame resistance, and performance under harsh conditions, commonly used in high-temperature electrical applications like circuit breakers and motor parts. Both materials provide distinct advantages in electrical engineering with PBT favored for moderate thermal environments and PPS selected for demanding, high-temperature use.

Material Properties Overview: PBT vs PPS

Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) offers excellent electrical insulation, high dimensional stability, and good chemical resistance, making it suitable for standard electrical components requiring moderate heat resistance up to 120degC. Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) exhibits superior thermal stability with continuous use temperatures exceeding 200degC, exceptional flame retardancy, and outstanding chemical resistance, ideal for high-performance electrical applications exposed to harsh environments. Both materials provide low moisture absorption and strong mechanical strength, but PPS outperforms PBT in high-temperature electrical insulation and long-term durability.

Thermal Stability and Heat Resistance

Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) exhibits superior thermal stability and heat resistance compared to polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), with a continuous service temperature exceeding 200degC, making it ideal for high-performance electrical components. PBT typically has a maximum continuous operating temperature around 120-130degC, limiting its use in applications with elevated heat exposure. PPS also maintains dimensional stability and electrical insulation properties under prolonged thermal stress, essential for reliable performance in demanding electrical environments.

Electrical Insulation Performance

Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) exhibits superior electrical insulation properties compared to polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), characterized by higher dielectric strength and improved resistance to electrical tracking and arc. PPS maintains stable insulation performance under elevated temperatures and humid conditions, making it ideal for high-performance electrical components exposed to harsh environments. In contrast, PBT offers good insulation but tends to degrade faster in thermal stress and moisture, limiting its application in high-demand electrical insulation scenarios.

Chemical and Environmental Resistance

Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) offers superior chemical resistance compared to polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), excelling in harsh solvents, acids, and bases commonly encountered in electrical components. PPS maintains dimensional stability and mechanical integrity at elevated temperatures and aggressive environments, making it ideal for high-performance electrical applications. PBT provides good chemical resistance and electrical insulation but is less resistant to hydrolysis and harsh chemicals, limiting its use in extreme environmental conditions.

Mechanical Strength and Dimensional Stability

Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) offers excellent mechanical strength with high tensile and impact resistance, making it highly suitable for electrical components exposed to mechanical stress. Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) surpasses PBT in dimensional stability, maintaining shape and performance under high temperatures and harsh chemical environments typically found in electrical applications. For applications requiring superior thermal resistance and minimal deformation, PPS provides enhanced long-term reliability compared to PBT, which excels in toughness and ease of processing.

Processability and Manufacturing Considerations

Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) offers excellent melt flow characteristics, enabling easier injection molding and faster cycle times, making it highly suitable for complex electrical components. Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) provides superior thermal stability and chemical resistance but requires higher processing temperatures and specialized equipment, increasing manufacturing complexity. The choice between PBT and PPS depends on balancing ease of processing with performance demands in electrical applications.

Cost Comparison and Economic Factors

Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) offers lower raw material costs and easier processing, making it a more economical choice for electrical components with moderate performance requirements. Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) commands a higher price due to superior thermal stability, chemical resistance, and dimensional stability, justifying its use in demanding electrical applications where long-term reliability is critical. Economic factors favor PBT for cost-sensitive projects, while PPS is preferred when performance and durability outweigh initial expense.

Typical Applications in Electrical Components

Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) is widely used in electrical connectors, switch housings, and lamp holders due to its excellent electrical insulation properties, dimensional stability, and resistance to heat and chemicals. Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) is preferred for high-performance electrical components such as circuit breakers, semiconductor manufacturing parts, and automotive ignition systems because of its superior thermal stability, flame retardance, and low smoke emission. Both materials are essential in electronics where durable, reliable insulation and resistance to environmental stresses are critical for performance and safety.

Choosing the Right Material: Key Decision Factors

Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) offers excellent electrical insulation properties, chemical resistance, and dimensional stability, making it ideal for precision electrical components exposed to moisture. Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) provides superior thermal resistance up to 260degC, outstanding flame retardancy, and excellent mechanical strength, suited for high-temperature electrical environments. Key decision factors include operating temperature requirements, exposure to chemicals and moisture, mechanical load, and cost considerations to ensure optimal durability and performance in electrical applications.

Polybutylene terephthalate vs. Polyphenylene sulfide for electrical component - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Polybutylene terephthalate vs Polyphenylene sulfide for Electrical Component



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Polybutylene terephthalate vs Polyphenylene sulfide for Electrical Component are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet