Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene vs. polyoxymethylene for gears - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) offers excellent impact resistance and ease of machining for gears, while polyoxymethylene (POM) provides superior dimensional stability, low friction, and high wear resistance. POM is preferred for precision gears requiring long-lasting performance under continuous mechanical stress.

Table of Comparison

Property Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) Polyoxymethylene (POM)
Material Type Thermoplastic Polymer Engineering Thermoplastic
Density 1.04 g/cm3 1.41 g/cm3
Tensile Strength 40 MPa 60-70 MPa
Impact Resistance High Moderate to High
Wear Resistance Moderate Excellent
Coefficient of Friction 0.4 - 0.5 0.1 - 0.3
Moisture Absorption Low Very Low
Operating Temperature Range -20degC to 80degC -40degC to 100degC
Dimensional Stability Moderate High
Typical Gear Application Light load, general purpose gears High precision, high load gears

Introduction to Gear Materials: ABS vs POM

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) offers toughness and impact resistance suited for gears subjected to moderate mechanical stress, while Polyoxymethylene (POM), also known as acetal, provides superior stiffness, low friction, and excellent dimensional stability ideal for high-precision gear applications. ABS is favored for its ease of molding and cost-effectiveness, making it suitable for consumer products, whereas POM's high wear resistance and low moisture absorption ensure longevity in automotive and industrial gears. Selecting between ABS and POM depends on the gear's operational environment, load requirements, and desired performance characteristics.

Mechanical Properties Comparison

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) offers excellent impact resistance and toughness, making it suitable for gears exposed to dynamic loads and moderate wear. Polyoxymethylene (POM), also known as acetal, provides superior stiffness, low friction, and high dimensional stability, resulting in enhanced wear resistance and longevity in precision gear applications. While ABS excels in absorbing shocks, POM outperforms in mechanical strength and chemical resistance, critical factors for gears requiring consistent performance under continuous stress.

Wear Resistance and Durability

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) offers moderate wear resistance and good impact durability, making it suitable for gears in low to medium load applications. Polyoxymethylene (POM), also known as acetal, provides superior wear resistance and higher mechanical strength, ensuring long-lasting performance under continuous stress and friction. The inherent low coefficient of friction and excellent dimensional stability of POM results in enhanced gear lifespan compared to ABS in demanding environments.

Friction and Lubrication Performance

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) exhibits moderate friction levels and generally requires additional lubrication to enhance wear resistance in gear applications, while Polyoxymethylene (POM) offers superior self-lubricating properties and lower friction coefficients, making it ideal for high-performance gears. The intrinsic low friction and excellent dimensional stability of POM contribute to reduced wear and extended gear life under dry or lightly lubricated conditions. In contrast, ABS gears may experience faster degradation without proper lubrication due to higher friction and less inherent wear resistance.

Load-Bearing Capacity Differences

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) exhibits moderate load-bearing capacity suitable for low to medium stress gear applications, owing to its impact resistance and toughness. Polyoxymethylene (POM), also known as acetal, offers superior load-bearing capabilities due to its high stiffness, low friction, and excellent dimensional stability under heavy mechanical loads. Gears made from POM perform better in high-load environments, maintaining precision and wear resistance where ABS may deform or wear prematurely.

Chemical and Environmental Resistance

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) offers moderate chemical resistance, performing well against acids and alkalis but may deteriorate when exposed to solvents and oils, whereas Polyoxymethylene (POM) provides superior chemical resistance, excelling in resistance to fuels, solvents, and lubricants commonly encountered in gear applications. ABS has limited resistance to UV radiation and can degrade in harsh environmental conditions, while POM demonstrates enhanced environmental stability, including resistance to moisture, temperature fluctuations, and UV exposure. Choosing POM for gears ensures longer lifespan and reliability in chemically aggressive or moist environments compared to ABS.

Machinability and Manufacturing Ease

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) offers excellent machinability due to its lower melting point and good impact resistance, making it easier to shape and finish for gear manufacturing. Polyoxymethylene (POM), also known as acetal, provides superior dimensional stability and wear resistance but requires more precise machining techniques due to its higher stiffness and tendency to melt under excessive heat. Manufacturing ease favors ABS for rapid prototyping and complex geometries, while POM is preferred for high-performance gears demanding durability and low friction.

Cost Analysis for Gear Production

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) offers a lower material cost and easier processing compared to Polyoxymethylene (POM), making it a budget-friendly choice for gear production. POM boasts superior mechanical strength, dimensional stability, and wear resistance, which can reduce long-term maintenance costs despite higher initial expenses. Evaluating total cost of ownership, including manufacturing efficiency, durability, and replacement frequency, is critical for optimizing gear production investments.

Real-World Applications and Case Studies

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) is widely used in automotive gear housings and consumer electronics due to its excellent impact resistance and ease of machining, demonstrated by its application in appliance gear components requiring moderate strength and wear resistance. Polyoxymethylene (POM), also known as acetal, excels in high-precision gear manufacturing for industrial machinery and medical devices, providing superior dimensional stability, low friction, and high fatigue resistance under continuous load conditions, as evidenced by studies in precision gearboxes and prosthetic joint components. Case studies reveal that ABS is preferred for cost-effective, lightweight gear solutions with moderate mechanical demands, while POM is favored in high-performance settings demanding durability and consistent performance over extended lifespans.

Choosing the Optimal Gear Material: ABS or POM

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) offers excellent impact resistance and ease of machining, making it suitable for gears requiring moderate strength and dimensional stability. Polyoxymethylene (POM), also known as acetal, provides superior wear resistance, low friction, and high stiffness, ideal for precision gears subjected to continuous motion and heavy loads. Selecting between ABS and POM hinges on specific gear requirements, where ABS excels in cost-effective, lightweight applications, while POM dominates in high-performance environments demanding durability and mechanical precision.

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene vs. polyoxymethylene for gears - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene vs Polyoxymethylene for Gear



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene vs Polyoxymethylene for Gear are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet