Fused quartz vs. E-glass for composite reinforcement - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Fused quartz offers superior thermal stability and chemical resistance compared to E-glass, making it ideal for high-temperature composite reinforcement. E-glass provides excellent tensile strength and cost-effectiveness, commonly used in applications requiring good mechanical properties and moderate thermal resistance.

Table of Comparison

Property Fused Quartz E-Glass
Chemical Composition Pure SiO2 (silica) Alumino-borosilicate glass
Thermal Expansion Coefficient 0.5 x 10-6 /degC 5.5 x 10-6 /degC
Density 2.2 g/cm3 2.54 g/cm3
Tensile Strength 800 MPa 3450 MPa
Young's Modulus 72 GPa 73 GPa
Electrical Resistivity High (insulator) Moderate (insulator)
Thermal Stability Up to 1200degC Up to 600degC
Typical Use in Composites High-temperature applications, optical fibers General composite reinforcement, insulation

Introduction to Fused Quartz and E-Glass in Composites

Fused quartz is a highly pure form of silicon dioxide known for its exceptional thermal stability, low thermal expansion, and superior chemical resistance, making it ideal for high-performance composite reinforcement. E-glass, or electrical-grade glass, is a widely used fiberglass variant characterized by its excellent tensile strength, low cost, and good electrical insulating properties, making it a popular choice in composites for structural applications. Both materials significantly enhance the mechanical properties and durability of composites, but fused quartz is preferred in high-temperature or chemically aggressive environments, whereas E-glass offers cost-effective reinforcement for general-purpose composite manufacturing.

Material Composition and Structure Comparison

Fused quartz is composed primarily of pure silicon dioxide (SiO2) with an amorphous glass structure, providing exceptional thermal stability and low thermal expansion. E-glass consists mainly of alumino-borosilicate glass fibers with higher aluminum oxide and boron oxide content, offering excellent tensile strength and electrical insulation properties. The amorphous, dense network of fused quartz contrasts with the multi-component crystalline phases in E-glass, influencing their mechanical performance and chemical resistance in composite reinforcement applications.

Mechanical Properties: Strength and Stiffness

Fused quartz offers higher tensile strength and stiffness compared to E-glass, making it ideal for applications requiring superior mechanical performance. E-glass provides good strength and modulus at a lower cost but typically exhibits lower tensile strength and stiffness than fused quartz. The high elastic modulus of fused quartz enhances composite rigidity, while E-glass composites balance mechanical properties with cost-efficiency.

Thermal Stability and Performance

Fused quartz offers superior thermal stability with a melting point around 1650degC and extremely low thermal expansion, making it ideal for high-temperature composite reinforcement applications. In contrast, E-glass, widely used for its cost-effectiveness and electrical insulation properties, has a lower softening point near 850degC and higher thermal expansion, which may lead to reduced performance under thermal cycling. The choice between fused quartz and E-glass significantly impacts the composite's heat resistance and structural integrity in extreme thermal environments.

Electrical Insulation Capabilities

Fused quartz exhibits superior electrical insulation capabilities compared to E-glass, with dielectric strength typically exceeding 20 kV/mm and minimal dielectric loss, making it ideal for high-voltage applications. E-glass offers good insulation but generally has lower dielectric strength around 10-15 kV/mm and higher moisture absorption, which can degrade its insulating properties over time. The ultra-low thermal expansion and chemical inertness of fused quartz further enhance its electrical stability in harsh environments.

Chemical Resistance and Durability

Fused quartz exhibits superior chemical resistance compared to E-glass, with exceptional stability against acids, bases, and solvents, making it ideal for highly corrosive environments in composite reinforcement. E-glass, while cost-effective and commonly used, is more susceptible to chemical attack and degradation, especially in alkaline conditions, reducing its long-term durability. The durability of fused quartz composites outperforms E-glass counterparts by maintaining structural integrity and performance in harsh chemical exposures over extended periods.

Weight and Density Differences

Fused quartz offers significantly lower density (approximately 2.2 g/cm3) compared to E-glass (around 2.54 g/cm3), making it ideal for lightweight composite reinforcement applications. The lower weight of fused quartz enhances strength-to-weight ratios, critical in aerospace and high-performance engineering sectors. This density advantage supports improved fuel efficiency and structural performance in composites reinforced with fused quartz fibers versus those with E-glass fibers.

Cost Analysis and Availability

Fused quartz, known for its superior thermal stability and mechanical strength, is significantly more expensive than E-glass, which is widely available and cost-effective for composite reinforcement. The high production costs and limited raw material supply of fused quartz restrict its use to specialized applications, whereas E-glass benefits from established manufacturing infrastructure and global availability, driving down costs. Cost analysis shows E-glass provides an economical balance between performance and price, making it the preferred choice in large-scale composite reinforcement projects.

Typical Applications in Industries

Fused quartz is predominantly used in high-performance electronic and semiconductor industries due to its exceptional thermal resistance and low thermal expansion, making it ideal for precision optical fibers and microelectronics components. E-glass fibers, known for their cost-effectiveness and high tensile strength, are widely employed in automotive, marine, and construction industries for manufacturing lightweight yet durable composite parts such as boat hulls, car panels, and structural frameworks. The choice between fused quartz and E-glass for composite reinforcement hinges on specific industry requirements for thermal stability, mechanical strength, and economic efficiency.

Choosing the Right Reinforcement: Key Considerations

When selecting composite reinforcement, fused quartz offers superior thermal stability and low thermal expansion, making it ideal for high-temperature applications. E-glass provides excellent mechanical strength and cost-effectiveness, suitable for general-purpose structural components. Key considerations include the specific thermal, mechanical, and budget requirements of the project to ensure optimal performance and durability.

Fused quartz vs. E-glass for composite reinforcement - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Fused quartz vs E-glass for Composite reinforcement



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Fused quartz vs E-glass for Composite reinforcement are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet