Polylactic acid foam vs. nitrile butadiene rubber foam for gaskets - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam offers a biodegradable and eco-friendly alternative to nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) foam for gaskets, exhibiting excellent chemical resistance and moderate cushioning properties. NBR foam outperforms PLA in oil resistance, flexibility, and durability, making it suitable for high-performance sealing applications in automotive and industrial environments.

Table of Comparison

Property Polylactic Acid (PLA) Foam Nitrile Butadiene Rubber (NBR) Foam
Material Type Biodegradable Thermoplastic Polymer Synthetic Rubber Polymer
Density Low to Medium (50-150 kg/m3) Medium to High (200-600 kg/m3)
Elasticity Low Elasticity, Rigid High Elasticity, Flexible
Chemical Resistance Moderate (Biodegrades in Moist Conditions) Excellent (Resistant to Oils, Fuels, Solvents)
Temperature Resistance Up to 60degC -30degC to 120degC
Compression Set Higher Compression Set (Less Recovery) Low Compression Set (Better Seal Recovery)
Environmental Impact Biodegradable, Sustainable Non-Biodegradable, Synthetic
Typical Applications Eco-Friendly Gaskets, Disposable Seals Automotive, Industrial Seals, Fuel-Resistant Gaskets

Introduction to Gasket Materials

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam and nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) foam are two distinct materials commonly used in gasket manufacturing, each offering unique properties suited for specific applications. PLA foam is a biodegradable, renewable polymer derived from corn starch, providing environmental benefits and suitable for low to moderate temperature sealing. NBR foam, a synthetic rubber known for excellent oil, fuel, and chemical resistance, delivers superior durability and flexibility in harsh industrial environments.

Overview of Polylactic Acid (PLA) Foam

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam is a biodegradable, renewable polymer derived from fermented plant starch, commonly corn, offering an eco-friendly alternative to synthetic materials like nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) foam. PLA foam exhibits good rigidity, thermal insulation, and moisture resistance, making it suitable for gaskets in applications requiring lightweight and sustainable materials. However, its lower elastic recovery and hardness compared to NBR foam limit its use in high-compression seal environments where oil and chemical resistance are critical.

Overview of Nitrile Butadiene Rubber (NBR) Foam

Nitrile Butadiene Rubber (NBR) foam is a synthetic rubber known for its excellent oil resistance, durability, and flexibility, making it ideal for gaskets in automotive and industrial applications. Its closed-cell structure offers superior sealing properties and resistance to compression set, outperforming Polylactic Acid (PLA) foam in mechanical strength and chemical resistance. NBR foam's ability to withstand harsh environments and maintain elasticity under stress ensures reliable, long-lasting gasket performance in demanding sealing applications.

Mechanical Properties Comparison

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam offers moderate tensile strength and stiffness suitable for lightweight gasket applications, whereas nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) foam exhibits superior elongation at break and excellent compressibility, making it ideal for sealing under dynamic mechanical stress. NBR foam provides better resilience and abrasion resistance, enhancing gasket durability in harsh environments, while PLA foam's mechanical properties tend to degrade under prolonged mechanical loading and high temperatures. The choice between PLA and NBR foams depends on specific mechanical demands such as flexibility, compression set resistance, and environmental exposure in gasket applications.

Chemical Resistance of PLA vs NBR Foam

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam exhibits limited chemical resistance, particularly vulnerable to hydrolysis and degradation when exposed to acids, bases, and solvents, making it less suitable for gaskets in harsh chemical environments. Nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) foam offers superior resistance to oils, fuels, and various chemicals, maintaining durability and flexibility in industrial gasket applications. The chemical stability of NBR foam under exposure to petroleum-based fluids and aggressive agents significantly outperforms PLA foam, ensuring longer service life and reliability.

Thermal Performance in Gasket Applications

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam offers moderate thermal insulation with a decomposition temperature typically around 200degC, making it suitable for low to medium temperature gasket applications. Nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) foam exhibits superior thermal resistance, maintaining integrity up to 120degC with excellent compression set stability, ideal for dynamic sealing in automotive and industrial environments. The choice between PLA and NBR foams depends largely on specific thermal requirements, with NBR foam favored in higher temperature and more demanding gasket applications.

Environmental and Sustainability Considerations

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam offers significant environmental benefits compared to nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) foam due to its biodegradability and derivation from renewable resources like corn starch, reducing reliance on fossil fuels. NBR foam, while providing durable performance in gasket applications, poses sustainability challenges because it is petroleum-based and non-biodegradable, contributing to long-term environmental pollution. Choosing PLA foam enhances sustainability through lower carbon footprint and improved end-of-life options, aligning with eco-friendly manufacturing and waste reduction goals.

Cost Analysis and Availability

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam offers a cost-effective alternative to nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) foam, with production costs generally lower due to its biodegradable, bio-based composition and simpler manufacturing process. NBR foam remains widely available and preferred in industrial applications for its superior oil resistance and durability, though it often commands a higher price because of synthetic rubber raw materials and complex production methods. Availability of PLA foam is increasing alongside growing demand for sustainable materials, but NBR foam maintains broader market penetration and consistent supply in gasket applications.

Typical Applications in Industry

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam is commonly used in eco-friendly packaging, medical device cushioning, and lightweight automotive components due to its biodegradability and stiffness. Nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) foam excels in industrial gaskets for oil, fuel, and chemical resistance applications, particularly in automotive, aerospace, and manufacturing sectors. Its superior durability and flexibility make NBR foam ideal for sealing and vibration dampening in harsh environments.

Choosing the Right Foam for Gasket Needs

Polylactic acid (PLA) foam offers biodegradable properties and good chemical resistance, making it suitable for environmentally conscious gasket applications with moderate temperature exposure. Nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) foam excels in oil resistance, flexibility, and durability under harsh industrial conditions, ideal for high-performance sealing requirements. Selecting the right foam depends on factors like environmental impact, chemical compatibility, temperature range, and mechanical stress specific to the gasket's operational environment.

Polylactic acid foam vs. nitrile butadiene rubber foam for gaskets - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Polylactic acid foam vs Nitrile butadiene rubber foam for Gasket



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Polylactic acid foam vs Nitrile butadiene rubber foam for Gasket are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet