Elastomeric foam vs. silicone foam for seal - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Elastomeric foam offers superior flexibility and thermal insulation for seal applications, while silicone foam excels in high-temperature resistance and chemical stability. Choosing between them depends on specific requirements such as temperature range, environmental exposure, and compression set performance.

Table of Comparison

Feature Elastomeric Foam Silicone Foam
Material Composition Synthetic rubber polymers Silicone-based polymers
Temperature Resistance -40degC to 105degC -60degC to 230degC
Durability Moderate resistance to wear and tear High resistance to aging, UV, chemicals
Compression Set Higher compression set, less recovery Low compression set, excellent recovery
Seal Effectiveness Good for low to moderate pressure seals Optimal for high-performance, airtight seals
Water Absorption Higher absorption, less suitable for wet environments Low absorption, ideal for moisture exposure
Cost Lower cost, budget-friendly Higher cost, premium material

Introduction to Elastomeric and Silicone Foams

Elastomeric foam, primarily made from synthetic rubber, offers excellent flexibility, thermal insulation, and resistance to moisture, making it ideal for sealing applications in HVAC and refrigeration systems. Silicone foam distinguishes itself with superior temperature stability, chemical resistance, and durability, often used in harsh environments requiring long-lasting seals. Both materials provide effective sealing solutions, but the choice depends on specific application requirements such as temperature range and exposure conditions.

Material Composition and Structure

Elastomeric foam is primarily composed of synthetic rubber polymers such as neoprene, nitrile, or EPDM, offering a closed-cell structure that provides excellent resistance to water, air, and thermal insulation. Silicone foam consists of a silicon-based polymer matrix with a flexible, open-cell or semi-closed-cell structure, delivering superior temperature resistance, chemical inertness, and durability in extreme environments. The choice between elastomeric and silicone foam seals hinges on specific application demands for thermal tolerance, chemical exposure, and compression recovery.

Mechanical Properties Comparison

Elastomeric foam exhibits superior flexibility and compression set resistance, making it ideal for dynamic sealing applications requiring repeated deformation and recovery. Silicone foam offers excellent thermal stability and resilience across a wide temperature range, maintaining mechanical integrity under extreme conditions. While elastomeric foam provides higher tear strength and durability in harsh environments, silicone foam excels in chemical resistance and long-term elasticity.

Temperature Resistance and Thermal Stability

Elastomeric foam offers temperature resistance typically ranging from -40degC to 125degC, making it suitable for general sealing applications with moderate thermal demands. Silicone foam excels with superior thermal stability, enduring temperatures from -60degC up to 230degC, which ensures reliable performance in high-temperature environments. This enhanced heat resistance makes silicone foam the preferred choice for seals exposed to extreme thermal cycling and harsh conditions.

Chemical Resistance

Elastomeric foam offers moderate chemical resistance, suitable for applications involving water, oils, and mild solvents, but it can degrade when exposed to harsh chemicals or hydrocarbons. Silicone foam provides superior chemical resistance, with excellent stability against oils, fuels, ozone, UV radiation, and a wide range of aggressive chemicals, making it ideal for demanding sealing environments. Selecting silicone foam seals ensures enhanced durability and longevity in chemically aggressive conditions compared to elastomeric foam.

Compression Set and Resilience

Elastomeric foam offers superior resilience with a low compression set, maintaining its shape and sealing properties under repeated compression cycles, making it ideal for dynamic sealing applications. Silicone foam, while exhibiting good thermal and chemical resistance, generally has a higher compression set, which can reduce its long-term sealing effectiveness in high-stress environments. For applications requiring long-term durability and repeated deformation recovery, elastomeric foam typically provides better performance than silicone foam in maintaining a reliable seal.

Water and Air Sealing Performance

Elastomeric foam offers superior water sealing performance due to its closed-cell structure, which effectively blocks moisture infiltration in seals. Silicone foam demonstrates excellent air sealing capabilities with high elasticity and recovery, ensuring durable compression and airtight seals under varying temperatures. For applications requiring both water and air sealing, silicone foam provides enhanced resistance to environmental factors and maintains consistent performance over time compared to standard elastomeric foams.

Applications in Various Industries

Elastomeric foam seals offer excellent thermal insulation and flexibility, making them ideal for HVAC systems, automotive gaskets, and construction weatherproofing. Silicone foam seals excel in high-temperature resistance and chemical stability, proving essential in aerospace, medical devices, and electronics industries. Both materials provide effective sealing solutions, but selection depends on specific environmental conditions and durability requirements across diverse industrial applications.

Longevity and Maintenance

Elastomeric foam seals typically offer moderate longevity with good resistance to compression set and frequent exposure to environmental factors, making them suitable for applications requiring reliable basic sealing performance. Silicone foam seals excel in longevity due to their superior heat resistance, UV stability, and chemical inertness, resulting in minimal degradation over extended periods and reduced maintenance frequency. Maintenance of elastomeric foam seals often involves regular inspection and replacement to prevent material breakdown, whereas silicone foam seals require less frequent intervention, lowering overall maintenance costs in long-term installations.

Cost Analysis and Value

Elastomeric foam offers a lower initial cost compared to silicone foam, making it a budget-friendly option for sealing applications. Silicone foam provides superior durability and resistance to extreme temperatures, which reduces replacement frequency and long-term maintenance costs. Evaluating total cost of ownership reveals that silicone foam delivers greater value in demanding environments despite its higher upfront price.

Elastomeric foam vs. silicone foam for seal - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Elastomeric foam vs Silicone foam for Seal



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Elastomeric foam vs Silicone foam for Seal are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet