Ramin vs. Maple for Table - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Ramin wood offers a fine grain and smooth finish ideal for elegant table surfaces, while maple provides exceptional hardness and durability suitable for heavy-use tables. Maple's tight grain patterns also resist wear and stains better than ramin, making it the preferred choice for long-lasting furniture.

Table of Comparison

Feature Ramin Maple
Wood Type Tropical hardwood Hardwood (Temperate)
Grain Straight, fine Fine, uniform
Color Light cream to yellow Light cream to reddish-brown
Density 560 kg/m3 700 kg/m3
Hardness (Janka) 980 lbf 1450 lbf
Workability Easy to machine Moderate, can dull tools
Durability Moderate resistance to decay High resistance to wear and decay
Best Uses Indoor furniture, carvings Tables, flooring, cabinetry
Price Generally affordable Higher price, premium quality

Introduction to Ramin and Maple Wood

Ramin wood, derived from the genus Gonystylus native to Southeast Asia, is prized for its pale, creamy color and fine, uniform texture, making it ideal for furniture, cabinetry, and intricate carvings. Maple wood, sourced primarily from North American species Acer saccharum and Acer rubrum, features a dense grain with a smooth, light-to-medium reddish-brown hue, valued for its strength and durability in flooring, cabinetry, and sports equipment. Both woods offer distinct aesthetic and functional properties, with Ramin leaning toward delicate detailing and Maple emphasizing robustness and longevity.

Botanical Origins of Ramin and Maple

Ramin (Gonystylus spp.) is a tropical hardwood native to Southeast Asia, primarily found in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei, known for its fine texture and pale yellow to light brown color. Maple, originating predominantly from North America and parts of Europe and Asia, encompasses species like Acer saccharum (sugar maple) and Acer platanoides (Norway maple), valued for its dense, durable wood with a fine grain and light creamy to reddish-brown hues. The botanical differences influence their applications in furniture and table making, with Ramin prized for its uniformity and Maple for its hardness and resistance to wear.

Physical Appearance and Color Comparison

Ramin wood features a fine, even texture with a pale yellow to light reddish-brown hue, often displaying a subtle, uniform grain pattern that enhances its aesthetic appeal in furniture and cabinetry. Maple wood exhibits a predominantly light cream to reddish-brown color with a smooth, consistent grain, presenting a more uniform and slightly glossy finish compared to Ramin. Both woods offer a visually appealing light tone, but Maple tends to have a brighter, cleaner appearance, while Ramin offers more warmth and subtle variation in color intensity.

Grain Patterns and Texture Differences

Ramin wood exhibits a straight, fine grain pattern with a consistent texture, making it ideal for smooth, uniform table surfaces. Maple features a tight, often wavy or curly grain that creates a visually dynamic texture, enhancing the table's aesthetic appeal. The subtle differences in grain and texture between Ramin and Maple influence the table's durability and decorative style, with Ramin offering a more understated look and Maple providing rich visual character.

Hardness and Durability: Ramin vs Maple

Ramin wood exhibits moderate hardness with a Janka rating of approximately 910, making it less resistant to dents and wear compared to Maple, which boasts a significantly higher Janka hardness of around 1450. This superior hardness in Maple contributes to its greater durability for high-traffic furniture and flooring applications, ensuring longer lifespan and resistance to impact. Although Ramin offers cost-effectiveness and smooth texture, Maple's exceptional hardness and durability make it the preferred choice for demanding uses requiring robust performance.

Workability and Ease of Crafting Tables

Ramin wood offers excellent workability with its smooth texture and fine grain, making it easy to cut, sand, and shape for crafting detailed tables. Maple is denser and harder, requiring sharper tools but providing superior durability and a fine finish ideal for high-quality, long-lasting tables. Both woods respond well to staining and finishing, though Ramin's softness allows for quicker crafting while Maple demands more precision and effort during construction.

Resistance to Wear, Scratches, and Stains

Ramin wood features a fine texture and medium hardness that offers moderate resistance to wear, scratches, and stains, making it suitable for light to medium use tables. Maple wood is renowned for its high hardness and dense grain structure, providing superior resistance to wear and scratches and better durability against stains compared to Ramin. Choosing Maple ensures a more robust and long-lasting table surface under frequent or heavy use conditions.

Environmental Impact and Sustainability

Ramin wood, sourced primarily from Southeast Asia, faces significant sustainability challenges due to illegal logging and deforestation, raising concerns about biodiversity loss and habitat destruction. Maple, particularly from well-managed forests in North America, offers a more eco-friendly alternative with sustainable harvesting practices and certifications like FSC supporting responsible forestry. Sustainable forestry management and certifications play crucial roles in reducing environmental impact and ensuring the long-term availability of both Ramin and Maple for table production.

Cost and Market Value for Furniture

Ramin wood is generally more affordable than maple, making it a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious furniture buyers while still offering a fine texture and light color. Maple holds a higher market value due to its superior hardness, durability, and aesthetic appeal, often preferred for premium furniture pieces that require excellent strength and aging resistance. Furniture made from maple typically commands better resale prices in the market, reflecting its reputation as a high-quality hardwood compared to the more economical ramin wood.

Best Choice: Which Wood is Ideal for Tables?

Ramin wood offers a fine texture and uniform grain, making it ideal for smooth, elegant table surfaces, while Maple is renowned for its hardness and durability, providing excellent resistance to dents and scratches. Maple's dense structure ensures long-lasting tables with superior wear resistance, perfect for high-traffic areas or heavy use. For a balance of beauty and strength, Maple is generally the best choice for tables requiring durability and a classic look.

Ramin vs. Maple for Table - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Ramin vs Maple for Table



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Ramin vs Maple for Table are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet