Maple vs. Redwood for Decking - What is The Difference?

Last Updated May 21, 2025

Maple offers exceptional hardness and durability for decking, with a Janka hardness rating of 1450, making it resistant to dents and wear. Redwood provides natural resistance to decay and insects due to its high tannin content, ensuring longevity and low maintenance in outdoor environments.

Table of Comparison

Feature Maple Redwood
Durability Moderate; prone to dents and scratches High; resistant to decay and insects
Hardness High (1450 Janka scale) Medium (420 Janka scale)
Moisture Resistance Low; requires sealing Excellent natural resistance
Maintenance Frequent sealing and sanding needed Low; occasional cleaning and sealing
Appearance Light beige to creamy color, fine grain Rich reddish-brown, straight grain
Cost Moderate Higher
Environmental Impact Sustainably sourced options available Often sustainably harvested; check certifications

Maple vs Redwood: An Overview

Maple offers exceptional hardness and durability, making it resistant to dents and scratches, while redwood is prized for its natural resistance to decay and insect damage due to its high tannin content. Redwood tends to have a warmer, reddish hue with straight grain patterns, whereas maple features a lighter color with subtle grain variations, ideal for users prioritizing aesthetics. Both woods require proper sealing to maintain longevity, but redwood generally performs better in outdoor conditions due to its natural oils and moisture resistance.

Durability Comparison: Maple and Redwood Decking

Maple decking offers exceptional hardness and resistance to wear, making it highly durable for heavy foot traffic areas. Redwood features natural oils and tannins that provide strong resistance to decay, insects, and moisture, enhancing its longevity in outdoor conditions. While maple excels in physical durability, redwood outperforms in weather resistance, making the choice dependent on environmental exposure and maintenance preferences.

Weather Resistance: Which Wood Performs Better?

Redwood offers superior weather resistance for decking compared to maple due to its natural oils that repel moisture and resist decay, making it ideal for outdoor use in varying climates. Maple is a hardwood prized for its durability and strength but is more susceptible to moisture damage and requires regular sealing to maintain its integrity. Choosing redwood results in longer-lasting decks with less maintenance in wet, humid, or changing weather conditions.

Appearance and Aesthetic Appeal

Maple decking offers a smooth, fine-grain texture with a light, creamy color that can brighten outdoor spaces and blend well with modern designs. Redwood features a rich, reddish-brown hue with natural color variations and prominent grain patterns, creating a warm, rustic aesthetic. Both woods can be finished with stains or sealants to enhance their natural beauty and increase durability in outdoor environments.

Maintenance Requirements for Maple and Redwood

Maple decking demands frequent sealing and staining to protect its tight grain from moisture damage and wear, often requiring annual maintenance to preserve its smooth finish. Redwood naturally resists decay and insects due to its high tannin content, allowing for less intensive upkeep, typically involving simple cleaning and occasional resealing every two to three years. Choosing between maple and redwood impacts long-term maintenance efforts, with redwood offering a more durable, low-maintenance solution for outdoor decking environments.

Cost Analysis: Maple vs Redwood Decking

Maple decking typically incurs higher initial costs due to its density and hardness, which require specialized tools and labor for installation, while redwood offers a more affordable price point with moderate durability. Redwood's natural resistance to decay and insects can reduce long-term maintenance expenses compared to maple, which may need additional treatments or protective coatings. Cost-effectiveness depends on balancing maple's superior strength against redwood's easier workability and these differing upkeep requirements.

Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Maple decking offers a sustainable option when sourced from responsibly managed forests certified by FSC, providing durability with a lower carbon footprint compared to exotic hardwoods. Redwood is naturally resistant to decay and insects, often harvested from regenerating forests, supporting carbon sequestration and biodiversity preservation. Both materials contribute to eco-friendly decking, but maple's faster growth rate and recyclability generally result in a smaller environmental impact.

Installation Process and Workability

Maple decking offers a smooth, dense grain that requires precise cutting tools and pre-drilling for fasteners to prevent splitting, making the installation process moderately challenging but rewarding in durability. Redwood, known for its natural softness and straight grain, allows easier cutting, nailing, and screwing without frequent pre-drilling, speeding up installation and reducing labor costs. Both woods benefit from proper sealing and maintenance post-installation to enhance longevity and resist weathering.

Longevity and Lifespan of Deck Materials

Redwood decking offers superior longevity due to its natural resistance to decay, insects, and moisture, typically lasting 15 to 30 years with proper maintenance. Maple, while durable and hard, is less resistant to weather-related damage and may require sealing to extend its lifespan, generally lasting around 10 to 15 years outdoors. Choosing redwood ensures a longer-lasting deck with lower maintenance demands compared to maple, especially in environments prone to humidity and pests.

Best Applications: Choosing the Right Wood for Your Deck

Redwood excels in outdoor decking due to its natural resistance to decay, insects, and moisture, making it ideal for decks exposed to harsh weather conditions. Maple, while durable, is better suited for indoor applications or covered decks since it lacks the same level of rot resistance. For long-lasting, low-maintenance decks in wet or humid climates, redwood offers superior performance and longevity compared to maple.

Maple vs. Redwood for Decking - What is The Difference?

Infographic: Maple vs Redwood for Decking



About the author. Kakani is a respected author and expert in materials for industrial and manufacturing applications. With years of experience in both research and industry.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Maple vs Redwood for Decking are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet